TDG vs. NOC
TDG (TransDigm Group Incorporated) and NOC (Northrop Grumman Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, TDG returned 22.15%/yr vs 11.31%/yr for NOC. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TDG vs. NOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDG achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than NOC's -4.43% return. Over the past 10 years, TDG has outperformed NOC with an annualized return of 22.15%, while NOC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.31% annualized return.
TDG
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 6M
- -10.46%
- 1Y
- -12.05%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 16.93%
- 10Y*
- 22.15%
NOC
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- -4.43%
- 6M
- -1.56%
- 1Y
- 12.23%
- 3Y*
- 7.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.31%
TDG vs. NOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDG TransDigm Group Incorporated | -9.29% | 12.15% | 32.27% | 66.57% | 1.77% | 2.82% | 10.51% | 84.41% | 23.83% | 19.84% |
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | -4.43% | 23.61% | 1.93% | -12.79% | 43.02% | 29.29% | -9.92% | 42.69% | -18.95% | 33.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDG and NOC is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2006 | 0.40 |
The correlation between TDG and NOC shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (3 years) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TDG:
$70.21B
NOC:
$77.07B
TDG:
$34.79
NOC:
$31.95
TDG:
34.67
NOC:
16.93
TDG:
1.03
NOC:
2.50
TDG:
7.38
NOC:
1.83
TDG:
$9.50B
NOC:
$42.37B
TDG:
$5.61B
NOC:
$8.69B
TDG:
$4.78B
NOC:
$7.50B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDG vs. NOC — Risk / Return Rank
TDG
NOC
TDG vs. NOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDG | NOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.11 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 0.39 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 1.05 | -1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDG | NOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 0.47 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.38 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.45 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.46 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
TDG vs. NOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDG drawdown since its inception was -62.64%, smaller than the maximum NOC drawdown of -71.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDG and NOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDG | NOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.64% | -71.12% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.30% | -31.20% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.30% | -31.20% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.30% | -31.20% | +5.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | -36.38% | -26.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.46% | -29.27% | +8.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -18.40% | +10.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.58% | 11.72% | +2.86% |
Volatility
TDG vs. NOC - Volatility Comparison
TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) at 7.22%. This indicates that TDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDG | NOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.72% | 7.22% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.00% | 21.13% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.63% | 26.48% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.81% | 25.27% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 25.42% | +8.36% |
Dividends
TDG vs. NOC - Dividend Comparison
TDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than NOC's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation | 1.74% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 1.57% | 1.24% | 1.59% | 1.86% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.27% | 1.50% | 1.64% |
TDG TransDigm Group Incorporated | 7.46% | 6.77% | 5.92% | 3.46% | 2.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.16% | 0.00% | 8.01% | 9.64% | 0.00% |
Financials
TDG vs. NOC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TransDigm Group Incorporated and Northrop Grumman Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TDG vs. NOC - Profitability Comparison
TDG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.51B and revenue of 2.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.
NOC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.96B and revenue of 9.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.
TDG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.18B and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
NOC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported an operating income of 989.00M and revenue of 9.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
TDG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported a net income of 535.00M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.
NOC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northrop Grumman Corporation reported a net income of 875.00M and revenue of 9.88B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TDG and NOC have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TDG has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to NOC (7.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDG dropped -62.64% vs NOC's -71.12%.
NOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDG and NOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer