PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCOM vs. NIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TCOM vs. NIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) and NIO Inc. (NIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCOM achieves a -34.35% return, which is significantly lower than NIO's 6.86% return.


TCOM

1D
-1.01%
1M
-10.38%
YTD
-34.35%
6M
-32.70%
1Y
-22.11%
3Y*
7.88%
5Y*
4.71%
10Y*
1.74%

NIO

1D
1.68%
1M
-6.84%
YTD
6.86%
6M
6.86%
1Y
50.14%
3Y*
-11.00%
5Y*
-33.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCOM vs. NIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TCOM
Trip.com Group Limited
-34.35%5.24%90.67%4.68%39.72%-27.01%0.57%23.95%-26.63%
NIO
NIO Inc.
6.86%16.97%-51.93%-6.97%-69.22%-35.00%1,112.44%-36.89%-3.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TCOM and NIO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.37

The correlation between TCOM and NIO shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TCOM:

$33.07B

NIO:

$13.52B

EPS

TCOM:

$47.68

NIO:

-$3.74

PS Ratio

TCOM:

0.53

NIO:

0.13

PB Ratio

TCOM:

0.19

NIO:

3.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

TCOM:

$62.20B

NIO:

$100.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TCOM:

$50.12B

NIO:

$15.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

TCOM:

$34.17B

NIO:

-$7.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCOM vs. NIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCOM
TCOM Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

NIO
NIO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCOM vs. NIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) and NIO Inc. (NIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCOMNIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.17

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

1.15

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

2.06

-3.10

TCOM vs. NIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCOM Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the NIO Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCOM and NIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCOMNIODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.61

0.80

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

-0.47

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

-0.03

+0.33

Drawdowns

TCOM vs. NIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCOM drawdown since its inception was -76.34%, smaller than the maximum NIO drawdown of -95.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCOM and NIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCOMNIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.34%

-95.00%

+18.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.27%

-43.73%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.27%

-79.69%

+38.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.36%

-94.10%

+38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.21%

-91.33%

+51.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.83%

-67.89%

+40.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.25%

24.47%

-3.22%

Volatility

TCOM vs. NIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) is 6.70%, while NIO Inc. (NIO) has a volatility of 19.67%. This indicates that TCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCOMNIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.70%

19.67%

-12.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.46%

40.94%

-13.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.34%

63.03%

-26.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.09%

71.70%

-22.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.30%

86.69%

-42.39%

Dividends

TCOM vs. NIO - Dividend Comparison

Neither TCOM nor NIO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
NIO
NIO Inc.
0.00%0.00%
TCOM
Trip.com Group Limited
0.00%0.42%

Financials

TCOM vs. NIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trip.com Group Limited and NIO Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
15.19B
25.53B
(TCOM) Total Revenue
(NIO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TCOM vs. NIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Trip.com Group Limited and NIO Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
79.0%
19.0%
Portfolio components
TCOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported a gross profit of 11.99B and revenue of 15.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

NIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.86B and revenue of 25.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.

TCOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported an operating income of 2.50B and revenue of 15.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

NIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported an operating income of -308.81M and revenue of 25.53B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.2%.

TCOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trip.com Group Limited reported a net income of 4.22B and revenue of 15.19B, resulting in a net margin of 27.8%.

NIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported a net income of -496.01M and revenue of 25.53B, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TCOM and NIO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NIO has higher volatility (19.67%) compared to TCOM (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCOM dropped -76.34% vs NIO's -95.00%.

NIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCOM and NIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer