TCEHY vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

TCEHY (Tencent Holdings Limited) is a stock, while GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Over the past 5 years, TCEHY returned -3.77%/yr vs 17.89%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TCEHY vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCEHY achieves a -25.13% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 0.30% return.

TCEHY

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -4.19%
• YTD: -25.13%
• 6M: -26.31%
• 1Y: -13.19%
• 3Y*: 11.01%
• 5Y*: -3.77%
• 10Y*: 11.22%

GLDM

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -8.41%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 6M: 3.19%
• 1Y: 30.55%
• 3Y*: 30.08%
• 5Y*: 17.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCEHY vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TCEHY Tencent Holdings Limited	-25.13%	45.23%	41.92%	-5.48%	-24.97%	-18.69%	50.09%	21.93%	-19.38%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.30%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TCEHY and GLDM is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018	0.15

The correlation between TCEHY and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TCEHY vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCEHY

TCEHY Risk / Return Rank: 25
TCEHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
TCEHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
TCEHY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
TCEHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
TCEHY Martin Ratio Rank: 27

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 34
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 39
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCEHY vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TCEHY	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	1.15	-1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.48	1.54	-2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.23	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.36	1.53	-1.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.78	3.85	-4.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TCEHY vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCEHY Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCEHY and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TCEHY	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.43	1.15	-1.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09	1.00	-1.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.99	-0.35

Drawdowns

TCEHY vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCEHY drawdown since its inception was -73.17%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCEHY and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCEHY	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.17%	-21.63%	-51.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.75%	-20.00%	-16.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.75%	-20.00%	-16.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.18%	-20.92%	-45.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.45%	-19.80%	-15.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.67%	-6.24%	-13.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.95%	7.96%	+8.99%

Volatility

TCEHY vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) has a higher volatility of 12.85% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 5.65%. This indicates that TCEHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCEHY	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.85%	5.65%	+7.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.49%	23.31%	+1.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.80%	26.65%	+4.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.23%	17.98%	+25.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.84%	16.89%	+21.95%

Dividends

TCEHY vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

TCEHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TCEHY Tencent Holdings Limited	1.19%	0.76%	0.82%	6.67%	4.15%	0.35%	0.19%	0.23%	0.26%	0.29%	0.51%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TCEHY and GLDM in my portfolio?

TCEHY and GLDM have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TCEHY or GLDM?

TCEHY has higher volatility (12.85%) compared to GLDM (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCEHY dropped -73.17% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.