PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCAF vs. DFCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCAF vs. DFCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCAF achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly higher than DFCF's -0.06% return.


TCAF

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
4.53%
6M
5.02%
1Y
17.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFCF

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
0.27%
1Y
5.55%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCAF vs. DFCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
4.53%15.45%20.93%8.40%
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
-0.06%7.89%1.86%4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TCAF and DFCF is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCAF vs. DFCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCAF
TCAF Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
TCAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAF Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAF Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

DFCF
DFCF Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DFCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFCF Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DFCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCAF vs. DFCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCAFDFCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.00

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.15

5.98

+0.17

TCAF vs. DFCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCAF Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the DFCF Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCAF and DFCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCAFDFCFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.42

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

0.02

+1.18

Drawdowns

TCAF vs. DFCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCAF drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum DFCF drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCAF and DFCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCAFDFCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-19.56%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-2.79%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-1.88%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.06%

-8.02%

+5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

0.93%

+1.90%

Volatility

TCAF vs. DFCF - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) at 1.34%. This indicates that TCAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCAFDFCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

1.34%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

2.94%

+6.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.68%

3.94%

+7.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

6.46%

+7.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.98%

6.46%

+7.52%

TCAF vs. DFCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCAF has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than DFCF's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCAF vs. DFCF - Dividend Comparison

TCAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than DFCF's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
4.33%4.48%4.61%4.51%3.27%0.16%
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
0.48%0.50%0.43%0.26%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCAF and DFCF have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCAF has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to DFCF (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCAF dropped -16.37% vs DFCF's -19.56%.

On 1-year performance, TCAF leads with 17.40% vs 5.55% for DFCF. On fees, DFCF is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, DFCF has been the lower-risk option at 1.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TCAF has performed better with a 17.40% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFCF is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for TCAF.

DFCF has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 0.48% for TCAF.

TCAF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DFCF is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for TCAF and 0.17% for DFCF.

TCAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCAF and DFCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer