PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TBLL vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TBLL vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TBLL achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 12.02% return.


TBLL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.48%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*

VEA

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.95%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TBLL vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TBLL
Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF
1.48%4.21%5.11%5.01%1.11%-0.01%0.93%2.20%1.85%0.62%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.02%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TBLL and VEA is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2017

-0.05

The correlation between TBLL and VEA shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TBLL vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TBLL
VEA

Financial Services

64.1%
23.3%

Basic Materials

-

7.5%

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.6%

Energy

-

5.4%

Healthcare

-

8.2%

Industrials

-

19.2%

Real Estate

-

2.7%

Technology

-

13.8%

Utilities

-

3.3%

Financial Services

TBLL
64.1%
VEA
23.3%

Basic Materials

TBLL

-

VEA
7.5%

Communication Services

TBLL

-

VEA
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TBLL

-

VEA
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

TBLL

-

VEA
5.6%

Energy

TBLL

-

VEA
5.4%

Healthcare

TBLL

-

VEA
8.2%

Industrials

TBLL

-

VEA
19.2%

Real Estate

TBLL

-

VEA
2.7%

Technology

TBLL

-

VEA
13.8%

Utilities

TBLL

-

VEA
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TBLL vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBLL
TBLL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TBLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TBLL vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TBLLVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+19.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+214.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

102.42

1.32

+101.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

414.75

2.42

+412.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3,515.41

9.39

+3,506.02

TBLL vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TBLL Sharpe Ratio is 20.94, which is higher than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TBLL and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TBLLVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.94

1.75

+19.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

7.56

0.55

+7.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.26

0.24

+4.03

Drawdowns

TBLL vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TBLL drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLL and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TBLLVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.63%

-60.68%

+60.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-11.63%

+11.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.36%

-13.45%

+13.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.36%

-29.71%

+29.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.40%

+3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.14%

-13.29%

+13.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

3.00%

-3.00%

Volatility

TBLL vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) is 0.04%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that TBLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TBLLVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.04%

6.03%

-5.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.12%

13.91%

-13.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19%

16.15%

-15.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.45%

16.63%

-16.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.56%

17.40%

-16.84%

TBLL vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TBLL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TBLL vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

TBLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than VEA's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TBLL
Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF
3.81%4.08%4.99%4.63%1.37%0.03%0.80%2.08%1.69%0.71%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.69%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


TBLL and VEA have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to TBLL (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLL dropped -0.63% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 9.09% vs 3.36% for TBLL. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, TBLL has been the lower-risk option at 0.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 9.09% return vs 3.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for TBLL.

TBLL has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 2.69% for VEA.

TBLL is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. TBLL tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for TBLL and 0.03% for VEA.

TBLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.94 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TBLL and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer