TBLL vs. VEA
TBLL (Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBLL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TBLL returned 3.36%/yr vs 9.09%/yr for VEA. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. TBLL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
TBLL vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBLL achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 12.02% return.
TBLL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- —
VEA
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
TBLL vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 1.48% | 4.21% | 5.11% | 5.01% | 1.11% | -0.01% | 0.93% | 2.20% | 1.85% | 0.62% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 12.02% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 22.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBLL and VEA is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2017 | -0.05 |
The correlation between TBLL and VEA shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TBLL vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TBLL
VEA
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
TBLL
VEA
Basic Materials
TBLL
-
VEA
Communication Services
TBLL
-
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
TBLL
-
VEA
Consumer Defensive
TBLL
-
VEA
Energy
TBLL
-
VEA
Healthcare
TBLL
-
VEA
Industrials
TBLL
-
VEA
Real Estate
TBLL
-
VEA
Technology
TBLL
-
VEA
Utilities
TBLL
-
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBLL vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
TBLL
VEA
TBLL vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBLL | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +19.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +214.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 102.42 | 1.32 | +101.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 414.75 | 2.42 | +412.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3,515.41 | 9.39 | +3,506.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBLL | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.94 | 1.75 | +19.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 7.56 | 0.55 | +7.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.26 | 0.24 | +4.03 |
Drawdowns
TBLL vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBLL drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLL and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBLL | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -60.68% | +60.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.01% | -11.63% | +11.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.36% | -13.45% | +13.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.36% | -29.71% | +29.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.40% | +3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -13.29% | +13.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 3.00% | -3.00% |
Volatility
TBLL vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) is 0.04%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that TBLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBLL | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.04% | 6.03% | -5.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.12% | 13.91% | -13.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19% | 16.15% | -15.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.45% | 16.63% | -16.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.56% | 17.40% | -16.84% |
TBLL vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBLL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TBLL vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
TBLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than VEA's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 3.81% | 4.08% | 4.99% | 4.63% | 1.37% | 0.03% | 0.80% | 2.08% | 1.69% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.69% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBLL and VEA have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to TBLL (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLL dropped -0.63% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 9.09% vs 3.36% for TBLL. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, TBLL has been the lower-risk option at 0.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 9.09% return vs 3.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for TBLL.
TBLL has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 2.69% for VEA.
TBLL is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. TBLL tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for TBLL and 0.03% for VEA.
TBLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.94 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBLL and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer