TBLL vs. SPYV
TBLL (Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TBLL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TBLL returned 3.36%/yr vs 10.75%/yr for SPYV. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. TBLL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
TBLL vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TBLL achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than SPYV's 6.98% return.
TBLL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
TBLL vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 1.48% | 4.21% | 5.11% | 5.01% | 1.11% | -0.01% | 0.93% | 2.20% | 1.85% | 0.62% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 6.98% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 14.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between TBLL and SPYV is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2017 | -0.07 |
The correlation between TBLL and SPYV shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TBLL vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TBLL
SPYV
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
TBLL
SPYV
Basic Materials
TBLL
-
SPYV
Communication Services
TBLL
-
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
TBLL
-
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
TBLL
-
SPYV
Energy
TBLL
-
SPYV
Healthcare
TBLL
-
SPYV
Industrials
TBLL
-
SPYV
Real Estate
TBLL
-
SPYV
Technology
TBLL
-
SPYV
Utilities
TBLL
-
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TBLL vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
TBLL
SPYV
TBLL vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TBLL | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +18.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +214.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 102.42 | 1.36 | +101.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 414.75 | 3.24 | +411.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3,515.41 | 12.39 | +3,503.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TBLL | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.94 | 2.04 | +18.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 7.56 | 0.75 | +6.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.26 | 0.42 | +3.84 |
Drawdowns
TBLL vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TBLL drawdown since its inception was -0.63%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TBLL and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TBLL | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | -58.45% | +57.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.01% | -6.22% | +6.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.36% | -17.54% | +17.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.36% | -17.89% | +17.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.35% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -8.71% | +8.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 1.62% | -1.62% |
Volatility
TBLL vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) is 0.04%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) has a volatility of 2.28%. This indicates that TBLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TBLL | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.04% | 2.28% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.12% | 7.18% | -7.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19% | 9.91% | -9.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.45% | 14.41% | -13.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.56% | 16.95% | -16.39% |
TBLL vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TBLL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TBLL vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
TBLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than SPYV's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 3.81% | 4.08% | 4.99% | 4.63% | 1.37% | 0.03% | 0.80% | 2.08% | 1.69% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TBLL and SPYV have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYV has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to TBLL (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TBLL dropped -0.63% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 5-year performance, SPYV leads with 10.75% vs 3.36% for TBLL. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, TBLL has been the lower-risk option at 0.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 10.75% return vs 3.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for TBLL.
TBLL has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 1.70% for SPYV.
TBLL is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while SPYV is S&P 500. TBLL tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for TBLL and 0.04% for SPYV.
TBLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.94 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TBLL and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer