TAYD vs. TRAK
TAYD (Taylor Devices, Inc.) and TRAK (Park City Group Inc) are both stocks. TAYD operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while TRAK operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past year, TAYD returned 49.71% vs -54.07% for TRAK. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TAYD vs. TRAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAYD achieves a -6.24% return, which is significantly higher than TRAK's -18.70% return.
TAYD
- 1D
- 3.36%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- -6.24%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 49.71%
- 3Y*
- 40.58%
- 5Y*
- 35.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.58%
TRAK
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- -18.70%
- 6M
- -25.66%
- 1Y
- -54.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAYD vs. TRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TAYD Taylor Devices, Inc. | -6.24% | 40.46% | -5.41% |
TRAK Park City Group Inc | -18.70% | -43.84% | 18.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAYD and TRAK is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2024 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
TAYD:
$4.95
TRAK:
$104.56
TAYD:
11.07
TRAK:
0.10
TAYD:
0.12
TRAK:
0.00
TAYD:
3.10
TRAK:
0.03
TAYD:
$37.08M
TRAK:
$5.90B
TAYD:
$21.95M
TRAK:
$5.09B
TAYD:
$13.00M
TRAK:
$1.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAYD vs. TRAK — Risk / Return Rank
TAYD
TRAK
TAYD vs. TRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) and Park City Group Inc (TRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAYD | TRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.76 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | -0.81 | +1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.56 | -1.27 | +3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAYD | TRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | -1.26 | +2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | -0.76 | +0.89 |
Drawdowns
TAYD vs. TRAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAYD drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, which is greater than TRAK's maximum drawdown of -70.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAYD and TRAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAYD | TRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.52% | -70.93% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.06% | -67.03% | +21.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.07% | -59.11% | +20.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.29% | -32.19% | -5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.47% | 43.10% | -23.63% |
Volatility
TAYD vs. TRAK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) is 10.68%, while Park City Group Inc (TRAK) has a volatility of 12.23%. This indicates that TAYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAYD | TRAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 12.23% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.11% | 33.26% | +11.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.53% | 43.17% | +15.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.12% | 40.79% | +12.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.24% | 40.79% | +5.45% |
Dividends
TAYD vs. TRAK - Dividend Comparison
TAYD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
TAYD Taylor Devices, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRAK Park City Group Inc | 0.78% | 0.62% | 0.16% |
Financials
TAYD vs. TRAK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taylor Devices, Inc. and Park City Group Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TAYD and TRAK have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRAK has higher volatility (12.23%) compared to TAYD (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAYD dropped -74.52% vs TRAK's -70.93%.
TAYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAYD and TRAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer