TAYD vs. FUL

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

TAYD (Taylor Devices, Inc.) and FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) are both stocks. TAYD operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, TAYD returned 12.58%/yr vs 3.54%/yr for FUL. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TAYD vs. FUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAYD achieves a -6.24% return, which is significantly lower than FUL's 1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, TAYD has outperformed FUL with an annualized return of 12.58%, while FUL has yielded a comparatively lower 3.54% annualized return.

TAYD

• 1D: 3.36%
• 1M: 5.48%
• YTD: -6.24%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 49.71%
• 3Y*: 40.58%
• 5Y*: 35.50%
• 10Y*: 12.58%

FUL

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: 4.84%
• 1Y: 8.55%
• 3Y*: -1.57%
• 5Y*: -1.62%
• 10Y*: 3.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAYD vs. FUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TAYD Taylor Devices, Inc.	-6.24%	40.46%	88.07%	55.95%	29.91%	4.33%	-0.38%	-13.71%	-9.24%	-11.71%
FUL H.B. Fuller Company	1.73%	-10.46%	-16.19%	14.97%	-10.59%	57.84%	2.15%	22.42%	-19.84%	12.79%

Correlation

The correlation between TAYD and FUL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 1995	0.07

The correlation between TAYD and FUL shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS TAYD : $4.95 FUL : $2.88
PE Ratio TAYD : 11.07 FUL : 20.81
PS Ratio TAYD : 3.10 FUL : 0.96
Total Revenue (TTM) TAYD : $37.08M FUL : $3.46B
Gross Profit (TTM) TAYD : $21.95M FUL : $1.11B
EBITDA (TTM) TAYD : $13.00M FUL : $495.48M

Return for Risk

TAYD vs. FUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAYD

TAYD Risk / Return Rank: 66
TAYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
TAYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TAYD Omega Ratio Rank: 66
TAYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
TAYD Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FUL

FUL Risk / Return Rank: 50
FUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FUL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FUL Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAYD vs. FUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TAYD	FUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	0.25	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	0.64	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.07	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	0.32	+0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.56	0.98	+1.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TAYD vs. FUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAYD Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the FUL Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAYD and FUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TAYD	FUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	0.25	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	-0.06	+0.73
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	0.11	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.27	-0.13

Drawdowns

TAYD vs. FUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAYD drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, which is greater than FUL's maximum drawdown of -68.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAYD and FUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAYD	FUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.52%	-68.25%	-6.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.06%	-26.97%	-18.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.65%	-43.45%	-9.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.65%	-43.45%	-9.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.49%	-56.29%	-10.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.07%	-28.49%	-10.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.29%	-18.76%	-18.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.47%	8.70%	+10.77%

Volatility

TAYD vs. FUL - Volatility Comparison

Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) and H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) have volatilities of 10.68% and 11.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAYD	FUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.68%	11.03%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.11%	26.42%	+18.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.53%	34.82%	+23.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.12%	29.38%	+23.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.24%	31.11%	+15.13%

Dividends

TAYD vs. FUL - Dividend Comparison

TAYD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FUL H.B. Fuller Company	1.58%	1.56%	1.29%	0.99%	1.03%	0.82%	1.25%	1.23%	1.44%	1.10%	1.14%	1.40%
TAYD Taylor Devices, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TAYD and FUL in my portfolio?

TAYD and FUL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TAYD or FUL?

FUL has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to TAYD (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAYD dropped -74.52% vs FUL's -68.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TAYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.