TATYY vs. MNG.L
TATYY (Tate & Lyle PLC ADR) and MNG.L (M&G plc) are both stocks. TATYY operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while MNG.L operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, TATYY returned -1.47%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for MNG.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TATYY vs. MNG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TATYY is traded in USD, while MNG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MNG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TATYY achieves a 47.55% return, which is significantly higher than MNG.L's 13.54% return.
TATYY
- 1D
- 12.60%
- 1M
- 46.04%
- YTD
- 47.55%
- 6M
- 53.00%
- 1Y
- 1.87%
- 3Y*
- -5.92%
- 5Y*
- -1.47%
- 10Y*
- 3.54%
MNG.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 13.54%
- 6M
- 20.50%
- 1Y
- 36.24%
- 3Y*
- 28.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.76%
- 10Y*
- —
TATYY vs. MNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TATYY Tate & Lyle PLC ADR | 47.55% | -35.21% | -0.61% | -0.36% | 18.05% | -0.65% | -1.93% | 15.29% |
MNG.L M&G plc | 13.54% | 70.40% | -4.29% | 38.09% | -8.45% | 8.92% | -8.62% | 10.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between TATYY and MNG.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2019 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
TATYY:
$3.34B
MNG.L:
£8.01B
TATYY:
$2.15
MNG.L:
-£0.02
TATYY:
0.94
MNG.L:
0.29
TATYY:
2.09
MNG.L:
2.56
TATYY:
$3.54B
MNG.L:
£27.20B
TATYY:
$722.00M
MNG.L:
£28.73B
TATYY:
$597.20M
MNG.L:
£2.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TATYY vs. MNG.L — Risk / Return Rank
TATYY
MNG.L
TATYY vs. MNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) and M&G plc (MNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TATYY | MNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.31 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | 2.65 | -2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.07 | 9.97 | -9.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TATYY | MNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | 1.79 | -1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.51 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.40 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
TATYY vs. MNG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TATYY drawdown since its inception was -57.06%, smaller than the maximum MNG.L drawdown of -66.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TATYY and MNG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TATYY | MNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.06% | -66.60% | +9.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.33% | -13.59% | -26.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.06% | -20.15% | -36.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.06% | -42.56% | -14.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.33% | -1.73% | -25.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.57% | -13.92% | -1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.06% | 3.63% | +22.43% |
Volatility
TATYY vs. MNG.L - Volatility Comparison
Tate & Lyle PLC ADR (TATYY) has a higher volatility of 39.19% compared to M&G plc (MNG.L) at 5.79%. This indicates that TATYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TATYY | MNG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.19% | 5.79% | +33.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.51% | 16.16% | +28.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.38% | 20.24% | +37.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.13% | 26.89% | +11.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.16% | 38.87% | -4.71% |
Dividends
TATYY vs. MNG.L - Dividend Comparison
TATYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than MNG.L's 6.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNG.L M&G plc | 6.55% | 7.05% | 10.01% | 8.95% | 9.80% | 9.19% | 4.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TATYY Tate & Lyle PLC ADR | 3.57% | 5.27% | 3.03% | 2.90% | 19.44% | 4.72% | 3.74% | 3.67% | 4.18% | 3.64% | 3.81% |
Financials
TATYY vs. MNG.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tate & Lyle PLC ADR and M&G plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TATYY vs. MNG.L - Profitability Comparison
TATYY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 996.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MNG.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, M&G plc reported a gross profit of 13.84B and revenue of 13.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
TATYY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported an operating income of 83.23M and revenue of 996.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.
MNG.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, M&G plc reported an operating income of 751.00M and revenue of 13.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.
TATYY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tate & Lyle PLC ADR reported a net income of 41.62M and revenue of 996.75M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
MNG.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, M&G plc reported a net income of 59.00M and revenue of 13.84B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TATYY and MNG.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TATYY and MNG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer