T vs. WFC
T (AT&T Inc.) and WFC (Wells Fargo & Company) are both stocks. T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while WFC operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, T returned 2.86%/yr vs 8.26%/yr for WFC. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
T vs. WFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -7.40% return, which is significantly higher than WFC's -12.21% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed WFC with an annualized return of 2.86%, while WFC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.26% annualized return.
T
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -10.57%
- YTD
- -7.40%
- 6M
- -7.40%
- 1Y
- -16.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 2.86%
WFC
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- -12.21%
- 6M
- -9.15%
- 1Y
- 8.39%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
T vs. WFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | -7.40% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | -12.21% | 35.57% | 46.48% | 22.94% | -11.92% | 61.15% | -41.65% | 21.44% | -21.83% | 13.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between T and WFC is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 1984 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, the correlation between T and WFC has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
T:
$3.04
WFC:
$6.73
T:
7.39
WFC:
12.03
T:
0.31
WFC:
1.04
T:
1.29
WFC:
2.08
T:
$125.65B
WFC:
$125.70B
T:
$105.41B
WFC:
$81.14B
T:
$54.70B
WFC:
$31.58B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
T vs. WFC — Risk / Return Rank
T
WFC
T vs. WFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| T | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.08 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 0.37 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 0.84 | -2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| T | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.75 | 0.32 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.49 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.26 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.33 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
T vs. WFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, smaller than the maximum WFC drawdown of -79.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and WFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| T | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.15% | -79.01% | +14.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.87% | -23.02% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.87% | -24.73% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -37.10% | +5.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | -64.46% | +22.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.87% | -15.11% | -6.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -15.35% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.34% | 10.06% | +0.28% |
Volatility
T vs. WFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AT&T Inc. (T) is 7.50%, while Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that T experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| T | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.50% | 8.57% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.57% | 19.98% | -2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.98% | 26.77% | -4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.97% | 30.25% | -6.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 32.30% | -8.59% |
Dividends
T vs. WFC - Dividend Comparison
T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than WFC's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | 4.93% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 2.22% | 1.82% | 2.14% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 4.04% | 3.57% | 3.56% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.71% |
Financials
T vs. WFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and Wells Fargo & Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
T and WFC have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WFC has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to T (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs WFC's -79.01%.
WFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for T and WFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer