T vs. ET
T (AT&T Inc.) and ET (Energy Transfer LP) are both stocks. T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while ET operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, T returned 2.86%/yr vs 13.08%/yr for ET. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
T vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -7.40% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 21.54% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 2.86%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 13.08% annualized return.
T
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -10.57%
- YTD
- -7.40%
- 6M
- -7.40%
- 1Y
- -16.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 2.86%
ET
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 21.54%
- 6M
- 19.30%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.40%
- 5Y*
- 21.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
T vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | -7.40% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 21.54% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between T and ET is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2006 | 0.24 |
The correlation between T and ET shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.24 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
T:
$3.04
ET:
$1.36
T:
7.39
ET:
14.21
T:
1.29
ET:
0.77
T:
$125.65B
ET:
$89.38B
T:
$105.41B
ET:
$20.48B
T:
$54.70B
ET:
$13.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
T vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
T
ET
T vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| T | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.18 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 1.62 | -2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 3.55 | -5.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| T | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.75 | 1.01 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.87 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.38 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.36 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
T vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| T | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.15% | -87.81% | +23.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.87% | -10.02% | -11.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.87% | -24.56% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -25.82% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | -72.82% | +30.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.87% | -5.15% | -16.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -25.74% | +10.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.34% | 4.57% | +5.77% |
Volatility
T vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
AT&T Inc. (T) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.27%. This indicates that T's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| T | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.50% | 5.27% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.57% | 11.84% | +5.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.98% | 16.12% | +5.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.97% | 24.87% | -0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 35.02% | -11.31% |
Dividends
T vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, less than ET's 6.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.90% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
T AT&T Inc. | 4.93% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
T vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
T and ET have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
T has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to ET (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs ET's -87.81%.
ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for T and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer