PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
T.TO vs. ZWB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

T.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TELUS Corporation (T.TO) and BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, T.TO achieves a -3.87% return, which is significantly lower than ZWB.TO's 18.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with T.TO having a 12.82% annualized return and ZWB.TO not far behind at 12.43%.


T.TO

1D
-1.05%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
-3.87%
6M
-4.00%
1Y
-17.45%
3Y*
-6.39%
5Y*
-3.68%
10Y*
12.82%

ZWB.TO

1D
0.35%
1M
5.16%
YTD
18.31%
6M
20.90%
1Y
52.20%
3Y*
26.73%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*
12.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

T.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
T.TO
TELUS Corporation
-3.87%0.34%-11.50%-4.41%-8.27%23.58%113.11%21.76%3.92%21.55%
ZWB.TO
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF
18.31%34.91%19.41%6.67%-11.00%30.81%1.68%14.32%-8.08%11.52%

Correlation

The correlation between T.TO and ZWB.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2011

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between T.TO and ZWB.TO has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

T.TO vs. ZWB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

T.TO
T.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
T.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
T.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
T.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
T.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

ZWB.TO
ZWB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ZWB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

T.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TELUS Corporation (T.TO) and BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


T.TOZWB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.89

-1.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

6.71

-7.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.27

30.11

-31.37

T.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current T.TO Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the ZWB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of T.TO and ZWB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


T.TOZWB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.04

4.62

-5.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

1.14

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.80

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.75

-0.14

Drawdowns

T.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum T.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, roughly equal to the maximum ZWB.TO drawdown of -39.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T.TO and ZWB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


T.TOZWB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.72%

-39.36%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.59%

-7.82%

-16.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.59%

-14.05%

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.60%

-25.26%

-13.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.60%

-39.36%

+0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.84%

-0.10%

-35.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.12%

-5.56%

-4.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.81%

1.74%

+12.07%

Volatility

T.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Volatility Comparison

TELUS Corporation (T.TO) and BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) have volatilities of 3.97% and 3.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


T.TOZWB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

3.89%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.40%

9.91%

+3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.82%

11.39%

+5.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

12.64%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.58%

15.68%

+17.90%

Dividends

T.TO vs. ZWB.TO - Dividend Comparison

T.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.82%, more than ZWB.TO's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
T.TO
TELUS Corporation
9.82%9.14%7.99%6.17%5.19%4.27%4.70%8.96%9.28%8.27%8.61%8.78%
ZWB.TO
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF
4.93%5.38%6.66%7.62%7.30%5.46%5.80%5.53%5.59%4.80%5.04%5.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


T.TO and ZWB.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for T.TO and ZWB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer