PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXR8.DE vs. SWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXR8.DE vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXR8.DE is traded in EUR, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXR8.DE achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly higher than SWDA.L's 9.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SXR8.DE has outperformed SWDA.L with an annualized return of 14.95%, while SWDA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.80% annualized return.


SXR8.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
3.85%
YTD
11.37%
6M
11.09%
1Y
25.10%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
14.95%

SWDA.L

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.74%
YTD
9.95%
6M
10.06%
1Y
22.07%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
12.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXR8.DE vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXR8.DE
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.37%4.73%32.32%22.47%-14.31%40.74%6.80%34.49%-1.05%6.67%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.95%6.76%26.95%20.08%-13.06%31.68%6.15%30.86%-4.97%7.38%

Correlation

The correlation between SXR8.DE and SWDA.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2010

0.85

The correlation between SXR8.DE and SWDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXR8.DE vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXR8.DE
SXR8.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SXR8.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXR8.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXR8.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SXR8.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXR8.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXR8.DE vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXR8.DESWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.38

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

3.36

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.71

13.73

-1.02

SXR8.DE vs. SWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXR8.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXR8.DE and SWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXR8.DESWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.01

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.90

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.85

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.53

+0.27

Drawdowns

SXR8.DE vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXR8.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.78%, smaller than the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -41.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXR8.DE and SWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXR8.DESWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.78%

-41.36%

+7.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-6.53%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.32%

-20.55%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.32%

-20.55%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

-33.00%

-0.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-1.27%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-8.78%

+3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.60%

+0.41%

Volatility

SXR8.DE vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) at 2.18%. This indicates that SXR8.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXR8.DESWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

2.18%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

7.61%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

10.93%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

14.08%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

15.24%

+0.85%

SXR8.DE vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXR8.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXR8.DE vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXR8.DE nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SXR8.DE and SWDA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SXR8.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXR8.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.

SXR8.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. SXR8.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SXR8.DE and 0.20% for SWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXR8.DE and SWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer