PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWPPX vs. SCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWPPX vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWPPX achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SWPPX has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 15.22%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.


SWPPX

1D
-2.66%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
8.38%
6M
8.46%
1Y
24.49%
3Y*
21.49%
5Y*
13.37%
10Y*
15.22%

SCHP

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
0.96%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
1.02%
10Y*
2.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWPPX vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
8.38%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%21.81%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
0.96%6.76%1.95%3.91%-12.02%5.87%10.86%8.52%-1.78%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SWPPX and SCHP is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2010

-0.07

The correlation between SWPPX and SCHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SWPPX vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWPPX
SCHP

Technology

35.6%

-

Financial Services

11.8%
0.0%

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
100.0%

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

SWPPX
35.6%
SCHP

-

Financial Services

SWPPX
11.8%
SCHP
0.0%

Communication Services

SWPPX
11.2%
SCHP

-

Consumer Cyclical

SWPPX
10.1%
SCHP
100.0%

Healthcare

SWPPX
8.5%
SCHP

-

Industrials

SWPPX
8.3%
SCHP

-

Consumer Defensive

SWPPX
4.9%
SCHP

-

Energy

SWPPX
3.5%
SCHP

-

Utilities

SWPPX
2.4%
SCHP

-

Real Estate

SWPPX
1.9%
SCHP

-

Basic Materials

SWPPX
1.8%
SCHP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWPPX vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHP
SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWPPX vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWPPXSCHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.26

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.50

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

7.59

+5.94

SWPPX vs. SCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWPPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the SCHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWPPX and SCHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWPPXSCHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.47

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.17

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.45

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.50

+0.01

Drawdowns

SWPPX vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWPPX drawdown since its inception was -55.06%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWPPX and SCHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWPPXSCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.06%

-14.26%

-40.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-1.93%

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-4.48%

-14.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

-14.26%

-10.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

-14.26%

-19.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.96%

-0.89%

-2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.94%

-3.93%

-6.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

0.63%

+1.28%

Volatility

SWPPX vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison

Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.00%. This indicates that SWPPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWPPXSCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

1.00%

+2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

2.24%

+7.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.21%

3.29%

+8.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

6.12%

+10.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.24%

5.59%

+12.65%

SWPPX vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWPPX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWPPX vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison

SWPPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than SCHP's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
4.01%4.06%2.99%3.02%7.19%4.39%1.11%2.02%2.26%1.90%1.38%0.28%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
1.02%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWPPX and SCHP have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWPPX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to SCHP (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWPPX dropped -55.06% vs SCHP's -14.26%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWPPX and SCHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer