SWDA.L vs. XGDU.DE
SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XGDU.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities) are both exchange-traded funds - SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while XGDU.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWDA.L returned 12.67%/yr vs 19.30%/yr for XGDU.DE. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SWDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XGDU.DE.
Performance
SWDA.L vs. XGDU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SWDA.L is traded in GBp, while XGDU.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XGDU.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly higher than XGDU.DE's -0.68% return.
SWDA.L
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 25.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.67%
- 10Y*
- 13.84%
XGDU.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.25%
- YTD
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- 1Y
- 31.56%
- 3Y*
- 27.52%
- 5Y*
- 19.30%
- 10Y*
- —
SWDA.L vs. XGDU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.92% | 12.64% | 21.11% | 17.59% | -8.33% | 23.64% | 26.83% |
XGDU.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | -0.68% | 56.85% | 28.36% | 7.24% | 12.86% | -3.52% | -8.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWDA.L and XGDU.DE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2020 | 0.05 |
The correlation between SWDA.L and XGDU.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (5 years) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWDA.L vs. XGDU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SWDA.L
XGDU.DE
SWDA.L vs. XGDU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWDA.L | XGDU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.26 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | 1.78 | +2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.36 | 3.70 | +11.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWDA.L | XGDU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 0.99 | +1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 1.01 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.69 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
SWDA.L vs. XGDU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -41.70%, which is greater than XGDU.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and XGDU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWDA.L | XGDU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.70% | -22.95% | -18.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -17.82% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | -17.82% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.50% | -17.82% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -17.82% | +16.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.50% | -7.08% | -2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 8.59% | -6.95% |
Volatility
SWDA.L vs. XGDU.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) is 2.48%, while Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.DE) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that SWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGDU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWDA.L | XGDU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | 5.22% | -2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.31% | 20.15% | -12.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.24% | 32.09% | -21.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 18.98% | -5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 18.95% | -4.38% |
SWDA.L vs. XGDU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XGDU.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWDA.L vs. XGDU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SWDA.L nor XGDU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SWDA.L and XGDU.DE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XGDU.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGDU.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.
SWDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XGDU.DE is Precious Metals. SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while XGDU.DE tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.12% for XGDU.DE.
Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and XGDU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer