SWDA.L vs. LQDH
SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while LQDH is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. SWDA.L is passively managed, while LQDH is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L returned 13.84%/yr vs 5.33%/yr for LQDH. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SWDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LQDH.
Performance
SWDA.L vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SWDA.L is traded in GBp, while LQDH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LQDH values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly higher than LQDH's 3.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L has outperformed LQDH with an annualized return of 13.84%, while LQDH has yielded a comparatively lower 5.33% annualized return.
SWDA.L
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 25.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.67%
- 10Y*
- 13.84%
LQDH
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 8.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.44%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
SWDA.L vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.92% | 12.64% | 21.11% | 17.59% | -8.33% | 23.64% | 12.25% | 23.03% | -3.78% | 11.78% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 3.16% | -0.62% | 9.31% | 5.59% | 9.79% | 2.80% | -1.30% | 5.34% | 3.60% | -3.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWDA.L and LQDH is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2014 | 0.36 |
The correlation between SWDA.L and LQDH shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (5 years) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWDA.L vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank
SWDA.L
LQDH
SWDA.L vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWDA.L | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.24 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | 2.40 | +1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.36 | 6.27 | +9.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWDA.L | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 1.35 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.76 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 | 0.51 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.56 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
SWDA.L vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -41.70%, which is greater than LQDH's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and LQDH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWDA.L | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.70% | -18.37% | -23.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -3.65% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | -10.80% | -7.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.50% | -11.17% | -7.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.58% | -18.37% | -7.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -0.98% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.50% | -4.12% | -5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 1.40% | +0.24% |
Volatility
SWDA.L vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) at 1.64%. This indicates that SWDA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWDA.L | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | 1.64% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.31% | 4.62% | +2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.24% | 6.52% | +3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 8.52% | +4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 10.44% | +4.13% |
SWDA.L vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWDA.L vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison
SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 5.96% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWDA.L and LQDH have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LQDH.
SWDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while LQDH is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.25% for LQDH.
Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and LQDH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer