SVOL vs. TMFC

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SVOL (Simplify Volatility Premium ETF) and TMFC (Motley Fool 100 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SVOL is a Volatility fund actively managed by Simplify, while TMFC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool 100 Index. SVOL is actively managed, while TMFC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SVOL returned 6.66%/yr vs 15.26%/yr for TMFC. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

SVOL vs. TMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVOL achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than TMFC's 5.68% return.

SVOL

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 2.47%
• YTD: -0.84%
• 6M: 1.19%
• 1Y: 10.38%
• 3Y*: 5.92%
• 5Y*: 6.66%
• 10Y*: —

TMFC

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 5.68%
• 6M: 5.24%
• 1Y: 22.16%
• 3Y*: 25.12%
• 5Y*: 15.26%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVOL vs. TMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SVOL Simplify Volatility Premium ETF	-0.84%	2.41%	6.77%	22.88%	-3.30%	12.70%
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF	5.68%	19.55%	35.17%	47.04%	-30.86%	23.51%

Correlation

The correlation between SVOL and TMFC is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021	0.67

The correlation between SVOL and TMFC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

SVOL vs. TMFC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SVOL	TMFC
Technology	31.9%	41.4%
Financial Services	11.4%	12.9%
Industrials	11.4%	4.0%
Healthcare	11.0%	4.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	11.4%
Communication Services	7.4%	17.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	4.3%
Energy	4.8%	1.9%
Real Estate	2.8%	0.9%
Basic Materials	2.5%	0.6%
Utilities	2.3%	0.5%

Return for Risk

SVOL vs. TMFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVOL

SVOL Risk / Return Rank: 19
SVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
SVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 19
SVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
SVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 19

TMFC

TMFC Risk / Return Rank: 47
TMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
TMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
TMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 51
TMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
TMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVOL vs. TMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) and Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SVOL	TMFC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	1.61	-1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.84	2.21	-1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.29	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	1.76	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.89	6.53	-4.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SVOL vs. TMFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the TMFC Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVOL and TMFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SVOL	TMFC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50	1.61	-1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.75	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.81	-0.47

Drawdowns

SVOL vs. TMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVOL drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, roughly equal to the maximum TMFC drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVOL and TMFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SVOL	TMFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.50%	-33.06%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.01%	-12.64%	-0.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.50%	-20.06%	-13.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.50%	-33.06%	-0.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.40%	-3.62%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.77%	-6.77%	+2.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.49%	3.40%	+2.09%

Volatility

SVOL vs. TMFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) is 2.77%, while Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that SVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SVOL	TMFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.77%	4.14%	-1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.82%	10.56%	-0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.78%	13.82%	+6.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.01%	20.41%	+1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.92%	22.00%	-0.08%

SVOL vs. TMFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SVOL and TMFC have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

SVOL vs. TMFC - Dividend Comparison

SVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.19%, more than TMFC's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SVOL Simplify Volatility Premium ETF	22.19%	19.82%	16.79%	16.36%	18.32%	4.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF	0.14%	0.14%	0.40%	0.26%	0.27%	0.23%	0.42%	0.50%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SVOL and TMFC in my portfolio?

SVOL and TMFC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SVOL or TMFC?

TMFC has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to SVOL (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVOL dropped -33.50% vs TMFC's -33.06%.

Which ETF is better, SVOL or TMFC?

On 5-year performance, TMFC leads with 15.26% vs 6.66% for SVOL. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, SVOL has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SVOL or TMFC?

Over the 5-year period, TMFC has performed better with a 15.26% return vs 6.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SVOL or TMFC?

SVOL and TMFC have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SVOL or TMFC?

SVOL has the higher dividend yield at 22.19%, compared with 0.14% for TMFC.

What is the main difference between SVOL and TMFC?

SVOL is categorized as Volatility, while TMFC is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Motley Fool.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.