SVM vs. HAL
SVM (Silvercorp Metals Inc.) and HAL (Halliburton Company) are both stocks. SVM operates in Silver (Basic Materials), while HAL operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 10 years, SVM returned 18.19%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for HAL. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SVM vs. HAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVM achieves a 27.95% return, which is significantly lower than HAL's 44.62% return. Over the past 10 years, SVM has outperformed HAL with an annualized return of 18.19%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively lower 1.02% annualized return.
SVM
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -20.96%
- YTD
- 27.95%
- 6M
- 36.46%
- 1Y
- 156.34%
- 3Y*
- 52.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- 18.19%
HAL
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 44.62%
- 6M
- 45.55%
- 1Y
- 101.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.92%
- 10Y*
- 1.02%
SVM vs. HAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 27.95% | 179.29% | 14.88% | -10.33% | -20.60% | -43.52% | 18.54% | 172.27% | -18.96% | 12.52% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 44.62% | 7.02% | -23.19% | -6.47% | 74.45% | 21.99% | -21.23% | -4.90% | -44.63% | -8.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVM and HAL is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2005 | 0.26 |
The correlation between SVM and HAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SVM:
$2.35B
HAL:
$33.98B
SVM:
-$0.05
HAL:
$1.82
SVM:
5.35
HAL:
1.55
SVM:
2.50
HAL:
3.14
SVM:
$437.11M
HAL:
$22.17B
SVM:
$254.02M
HAL:
$3.40B
SVM:
$185.32M
HAL:
$3.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVM vs. HAL — Risk / Return Rank
SVM
HAL
SVM vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SVM | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.42 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.57 | 7.82 | -3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.47 | 20.24 | -7.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SVM | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.78 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.32 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.02 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.14 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
SVM vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVM drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than HAL's maximum drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVM and HAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVM | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -92.99% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.46% | -13.10% | -21.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.86% | -54.01% | +11.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.10% | -54.01% | -14.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.19% | -91.45% | +15.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.09% | -31.36% | -14.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.67% | -39.13% | -32.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.59% | 5.06% | +7.53% |
Volatility
SVM vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a higher volatility of 25.49% compared to Halliburton Company (HAL) at 10.08%. This indicates that SVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVM | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.49% | 10.08% | +15.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.03% | 24.20% | +30.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.20% | 36.99% | +31.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.30% | 40.19% | +15.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.63% | 45.98% | +15.65% |
Dividends
SVM vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison
SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than HAL's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL Halliburton Company | 1.68% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% |
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 0.23% | 0.30% | 0.83% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.66% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 2.13% |
Financials
SVM vs. HAL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silvercorp Metals Inc. and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SVM vs. HAL - Profitability Comparison
SVM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported a gross profit of 99.96M and revenue of 145.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.
HAL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 790.00M and revenue of 5.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.
SVM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported an operating income of 93.44M and revenue of 145.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 64.3%.
HAL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
SVM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported a net income of -606.31K and revenue of 145.32M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.
HAL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 461.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SVM and HAL have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVM has higher volatility (25.49%) compared to HAL (10.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVM dropped -98.00% vs HAL's -92.99%.
HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SVM and HAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer