PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVARX vs. XLKQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SVARX vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SVARX is traded in USD, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVARX achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 19.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SVARX has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 5.98%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 25.93% annualized return.


SVARX

1D
-0.50%
1M
0.04%
YTD
1.10%
6M
2.04%
1Y
5.78%
3Y*
6.73%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
5.98%

XLKQ.L

1D
0.03%
1M
4.38%
YTD
19.38%
6M
17.34%
1Y
47.19%
3Y*
35.41%
5Y*
24.30%
10Y*
25.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVARX vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SVARX
Spectrum Low Volatility Fund
1.10%6.22%2.60%9.67%-4.35%4.10%19.50%9.42%-0.99%8.25%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
19.38%24.49%41.63%59.85%-29.07%35.05%42.15%50.17%-3.26%33.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SVARX and XLKQ.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2013

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVARX vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVARX
SVARX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SVARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVARX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SVARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVARX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

XLKQ.L
XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVARX vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SVARXXLKQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.39

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.79

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

8.47

-3.27

SVARX vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVARX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVARX and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SVARXXLKQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.36

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.89

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.63

1.09

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.69

0.71

+0.99

Drawdowns

SVARX vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVARX drawdown since its inception was -6.48%, smaller than the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -39.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVARX and XLKQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SVARXXLKQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-39.80%

+33.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

-16.81%

+14.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.55%

-26.96%

+24.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.48%

-35.00%

+28.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.48%

-35.00%

+28.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-6.38%

+4.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-9.19%

+7.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

5.56%

-4.47%

Volatility

SVARX vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX) is 0.79%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 7.63%. This indicates that SVARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SVARXXLKQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

7.63%

-6.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

15.32%

-13.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71%

19.95%

-17.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.10%

27.22%

-24.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.68%

23.87%

-20.19%

SVARX vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVARX has a 2.34% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

SVARX vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

SVARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, while XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SVARX
Spectrum Low Volatility Fund
5.88%5.95%9.35%3.35%0.00%5.85%0.71%4.91%2.41%6.90%9.07%3.02%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SVARX and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVARX and XLKQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer