SUUS.L vs. UIFS.L
SUUS.L (iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and UIFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SUUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while UIFS.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUUS.L returned 12.04%/yr vs 9.38%/yr for UIFS.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUUS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for UIFS.L.
Performance
SUUS.L vs. UIFS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUUS.L achieves a 12.98% return, which is significantly higher than UIFS.L's -4.03% return.
SUUS.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 12.98%
- 6M
- 12.98%
- 1Y
- 24.28%
- 3Y*
- 14.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.04%
- 10Y*
- —
UIFS.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- -4.03%
- 6M
- -1.70%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
SUUS.L vs. UIFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUUS.L iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.98% | 3.44% | 15.85% | 17.58% | -8.97% | 32.89% | 21.52% | 27.36% | 2.89% | 12.51% |
UIFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -4.03% | 7.07% | 32.24% | 6.12% | -0.45% | 38.07% | -6.59% | 27.05% | -9.40% | 12.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUUS.L and UIFS.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2016 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SUUS.L and UIFS.L has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SUUS.L vs. UIFS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SUUS.L
UIFS.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
SUUS.L
UIFS.L
Financial Services
SUUS.L
UIFS.L
Consumer Cyclical
SUUS.L
UIFS.L
-
Communication Services
SUUS.L
UIFS.L
-
Healthcare
SUUS.L
UIFS.L
-
Industrials
SUUS.L
UIFS.L
Consumer Defensive
SUUS.L
UIFS.L
-
Basic Materials
SUUS.L
UIFS.L
-
Real Estate
SUUS.L
UIFS.L
-
Utilities
SUUS.L
UIFS.L
-
Energy
SUUS.L
-
UIFS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUUS.L vs. UIFS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SUUS.L
UIFS.L
SUUS.L vs. UIFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUUS.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.07 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 0.37 | +2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.43 | 0.86 | +10.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUUS.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 0.34 | +1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.42 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.33 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
SUUS.L vs. UIFS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUUS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.46%, smaller than the maximum UIFS.L drawdown of -44.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUUS.L and UIFS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUUS.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.46% | -44.49% | +19.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -12.90% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.62% | -20.12% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.62% | -20.12% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -5.98% | +4.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.40% | -9.20% | +2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 5.56% | -3.44% |
Volatility
SUUS.L vs. UIFS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) is 3.59%, while iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that SUUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UIFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUUS.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 4.40% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.56% | 10.59% | -2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.61% | 13.98% | -2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 22.49% | -2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.03% | 22.43% | -2.40% |
SUUS.L vs. UIFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUUS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than UIFS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUUS.L vs. UIFS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SUUS.L nor UIFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SUUS.L and UIFS.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIFS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIFS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUUS.L.
SUUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UIFS.L is Financials Equities. SUUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while UIFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SUUS.L and 0.15% for UIFS.L.
Find the right allocation for SUUS.L and UIFS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer