PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUUS.L vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUUS.L vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SUUS.L is traded in GBp, while IBIT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBIT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUUS.L achieves a 12.98% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.01% return.


SUUS.L

1D
0.17%
1M
3.42%
YTD
12.98%
6M
12.98%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
14.35%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*

IBIT

1D
5.09%
1M
-19.33%
YTD
-27.01%
6M
-30.45%
1Y
-38.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUUS.L vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SUUS.L
iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.98%3.44%17.19%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-27.01%-13.08%93.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SUUS.L and IBIT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUUS.L vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUUS.L
SUUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SUUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SUUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUUS.L vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUUS.LIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.86

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

-0.75

+4.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.43

-1.34

+12.77

SUUS.L vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUUS.L and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUUS.LIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

-0.90

+2.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.18

+0.39

Drawdowns

SUUS.L vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUUS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.46%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -51.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUUS.L and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUUS.LIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.46%

-51.61%

+26.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-51.61%

+44.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-49.14%

+48.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.40%

-16.86%

+10.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

28.74%

-26.62%

Volatility

SUUS.L vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) is 3.59%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 11.96%. This indicates that SUUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUUS.LIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

11.96%

-8.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

33.58%

-25.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

43.15%

-31.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.13%

49.73%

-29.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.03%

49.73%

-29.70%

SUUS.L vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUUS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUUS.L vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

Neither SUUS.L nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SUUS.L and IBIT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SUUS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SUUS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

SUUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. SUUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SUUS.L and 0.25% for IBIT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUUS.L and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer