SUPV vs. TGS
SUPV (Grupo Supervielle S.A.) and TGS (Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.) are both stocks. SUPV operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while TGS operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, SUPV returned -1.56%/yr vs 18.52%/yr for TGS. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SUPV vs. TGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUPV achieves a -21.24% return, which is significantly lower than TGS's -5.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SUPV has underperformed TGS with an annualized return of -1.56%, while TGS has yielded a comparatively higher 18.52% annualized return.
SUPV
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 16.81%
- YTD
- -21.24%
- 6M
- -12.09%
- 1Y
- -23.06%
- 3Y*
- 54.92%
- 5Y*
- 33.51%
- 10Y*
- -1.56%
TGS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- -5.05%
- 6M
- -6.79%
- 1Y
- 6.23%
- 3Y*
- 32.47%
- 5Y*
- 38.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.52%
SUPV vs. TGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A. | -21.24% | -20.75% | 281.41% | 87.96% | 11.80% | -6.59% | -41.46% | -57.01% | -70.23% | 124.27% |
TGS Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. | -5.05% | 6.22% | 93.97% | 27.88% | 165.77% | -14.62% | -27.48% | -45.44% | -28.91% | 146.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUPV and TGS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2016 | 0.59 |
The correlation between SUPV and TGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
SUPV:
$735.60M
TGS:
$4.44B
SUPV:
-$72.13
TGS:
$3.05K
SUPV:
0.00
TGS:
0.00
SUPV:
0.00
TGS:
0.00
SUPV:
$1.02T
TGS:
$1.82T
SUPV:
$425.09B
TGS:
$985.40B
SUPV:
-$9.21B
TGS:
$1.03T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUPV vs. TGS — Risk / Return Rank
SUPV
TGS
SUPV vs. TGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) and Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUPV | TGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.08 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 0.19 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | 0.48 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUPV | TGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 | 0.10 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.71 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | 0.34 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.22 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
SUPV vs. TGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUPV drawdown since its inception was -95.98%, roughly equal to the maximum TGS drawdown of -95.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPV and TGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUPV | TGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.98% | -95.49% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.45% | -32.96% | -29.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.20% | -39.49% | -35.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.20% | -39.49% | -35.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.98% | -80.55% | -15.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.90% | -16.42% | -52.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.99% | -47.06% | -19.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.22% | 13.08% | +16.14% |
Volatility
SUPV vs. TGS - Volatility Comparison
Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) has a higher volatility of 22.37% compared to Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. (TGS) at 12.90%. This indicates that SUPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUPV | TGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.37% | 12.90% | +9.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.49% | 26.04% | +19.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.17% | 60.67% | +34.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.22% | 55.48% | +15.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.29% | 54.35% | +17.94% |
Dividends
SUPV vs. TGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither SUPV nor TGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUPV Grupo Supervielle S.A. | 0.00% | 1.71% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 1.36% | 1.79% | 2.03% | 1.32% | 0.30% | 0.00% |
TGS Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.46% | 5.04% | 0.00% | 0.34% |
Financials
SUPV vs. TGS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grupo Supervielle S.A. and Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SUPV vs. TGS - Profitability Comparison
SUPV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported a gross profit of 169.00M and revenue of 387.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.
TGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. reported a gross profit of 282.03B and revenue of 484.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.
SUPV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported an operating income of -15.76M and revenue of 387.59M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.1%.
TGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. reported an operating income of 249.34B and revenue of 484.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.5%.
SUPV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported a net income of -12.03M and revenue of 387.59M, resulting in a net margin of -3.1%.
TGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transportadora de Gas del Sur S.A. reported a net income of 159.98B and revenue of 484.20B, resulting in a net margin of 33.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SUPV and TGS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SUPV has higher volatility (22.37%) compared to TGS (12.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUPV dropped -95.98% vs TGS's -95.49%.
TGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SUPV and TGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer