PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUPV vs. LOMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SUPV vs. LOMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) and Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUPV achieves a -21.24% return, which is significantly lower than LOMA's -15.14% return.


SUPV

1D
-1.48%
1M
16.81%
YTD
-21.24%
6M
-12.09%
1Y
-23.06%
3Y*
54.92%
5Y*
33.51%
10Y*
-1.56%

LOMA

1D
-1.35%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
-15.14%
6M
-8.80%
1Y
-9.02%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
17.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUPV vs. LOMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUPV
Grupo Supervielle S.A.
-21.24%-20.75%281.41%87.96%11.80%-6.59%-41.46%-57.01%-70.23%9.36%
LOMA
Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima
-15.14%8.46%68.41%21.03%26.57%8.46%-16.62%-29.74%-51.69%6.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SUPV and LOMA is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2017

0.61

The correlation between SUPV and LOMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SUPV:

$735.60M

LOMA:

$1.28B

EPS

SUPV:

-$72.13

LOMA:

$336.44

PS Ratio

SUPV:

0.00

LOMA:

0.00

PB Ratio

SUPV:

0.00

LOMA:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

SUPV:

$1.02T

LOMA:

$829.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SUPV:

$425.09B

LOMA:

$182.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

SUPV:

-$9.21B

LOMA:

$174.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUPV vs. LOMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUPV
SUPV Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SUPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUPV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SUPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUPV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

LOMA
LOMA Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
LOMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOMA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LOMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOMA Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUPV vs. LOMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) and Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUPVLOMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.02

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

-0.21

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

-0.47

-0.32

SUPV vs. LOMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUPV Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the LOMA Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUPV and LOMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUPVLOMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

-0.16

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.38

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

-0.05

+0.04

Drawdowns

SUPV vs. LOMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUPV drawdown since its inception was -95.98%, which is greater than LOMA's maximum drawdown of -87.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPV and LOMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUPVLOMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.98%

-87.17%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.45%

-42.87%

-19.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.20%

-48.26%

-26.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.20%

-48.26%

-26.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.90%

-32.89%

-36.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.99%

-57.05%

-9.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.22%

19.15%

+10.07%

Volatility

SUPV vs. LOMA - Volatility Comparison

Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) has a higher volatility of 22.37% compared to Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) at 14.89%. This indicates that SUPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUPVLOMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.37%

14.89%

+7.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.49%

30.25%

+15.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.17%

58.07%

+37.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.22%

45.87%

+25.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.29%

55.19%

+17.10%

Dividends

SUPV vs. LOMA - Dividend Comparison

Neither SUPV nor LOMA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOMA
Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima
0.00%0.00%0.00%14.64%15.68%0.00%4.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SUPV
Grupo Supervielle S.A.
0.00%1.71%1.12%0.00%0.71%1.36%1.79%2.03%1.32%0.30%

Financials

SUPV vs. LOMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grupo Supervielle S.A. and Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T20222023202420252026
387.59M
218.74B
(SUPV) Total Revenue
(LOMA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SUPV vs. LOMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Grupo Supervielle S.A. and Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
43.6%
26.1%
Portfolio components
SUPV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported a gross profit of 169.00M and revenue of 387.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.6%.

LOMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima reported a gross profit of 57.03B and revenue of 218.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.1%.

SUPV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported an operating income of -15.76M and revenue of 387.59M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.1%.

LOMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima reported an operating income of 30.51B and revenue of 218.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

SUPV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Supervielle S.A. reported a net income of -12.03M and revenue of 387.59M, resulting in a net margin of -3.1%.

LOMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima reported a net income of 41.00B and revenue of 218.74B, resulting in a net margin of 18.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SUPV and LOMA have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SUPV has higher volatility (22.37%) compared to LOMA (14.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUPV dropped -95.98% vs LOMA's -87.17%.

LOMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUPV and LOMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer