PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUN vs. IWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUN vs. IWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sunoco LP (SUN) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUN achieves a 28.86% return, which is significantly higher than IWS's 13.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SUN has outperformed IWS with an annualized return of 18.61%, while IWS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.


SUN

1D
-1.15%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
28.86%
6M
25.56%
1Y
29.97%
3Y*
21.63%
5Y*
20.04%
10Y*
18.61%

IWS

1D
0.04%
1M
1.01%
YTD
13.43%
6M
13.77%
1Y
24.70%
3Y*
16.23%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUN vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUN
Sunoco LP
28.86%8.88%-8.59%49.38%13.95%55.26%6.28%24.78%7.71%17.86%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
13.43%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SUN and IWS is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2012

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between SUN and IWS has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUN vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUN
SUN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUN Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUN vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sunoco LP (SUN) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUNIWSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.33

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

3.29

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.02

12.38

-5.36

SUN vs. IWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the IWS Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUN and IWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUNIWSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.87

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.47

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.52

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.42

+0.11

Drawdowns

SUN vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUN drawdown since its inception was -65.47%, roughly equal to the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUN and IWS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUNIWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.47%

-62.40%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-7.53%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.29%

-20.57%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.29%

-21.23%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.94%

-43.83%

-19.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.29%

-1.83%

-7.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.31%

-8.02%

-8.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

2.00%

+2.28%

Volatility

SUN vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison

Sunoco LP (SUN) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) at 3.45%. This indicates that SUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUNIWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.42%

3.45%

+4.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.61%

9.74%

+6.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.92%

13.30%

+9.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.62%

17.32%

+6.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.75%

19.37%

+12.38%

Dividends

SUN vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison

SUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, more than IWS's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.36%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
SUN
Sunoco LP
5.73%6.89%6.74%5.59%7.66%8.09%11.47%10.79%12.14%11.63%12.16%6.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUN and IWS have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SUN has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to IWS (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUN dropped -65.47% vs IWS's -62.40%.

IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUN and IWS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer