STZ vs. YUM
STZ (Constellation Brands, Inc.) and YUM (YUM! Brands, Inc.) are both stocks. STZ operates in Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries (Consumer Defensive), while YUM operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, STZ returned 0.71%/yr vs 11.56%/yr for YUM. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STZ vs. YUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STZ achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly higher than YUM's -1.66% return. Over the past 10 years, STZ has underperformed YUM with an annualized return of 0.71%, while YUM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.56% annualized return.
STZ
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -4.97%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- -15.85%
- 3Y*
- -14.74%
- 5Y*
- -8.24%
- 10Y*
- 0.71%
YUM
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- YTD
- -1.66%
- 6M
- 4.38%
- 1Y
- 3.71%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.61%
- 10Y*
- 11.56%
STZ vs. YUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 3.44% | -35.99% | -7.11% | 5.83% | -6.43% | 16.12% | 17.41% | 19.85% | -28.73% | 50.69% |
YUM YUM! Brands, Inc. | -1.66% | 14.94% | 4.72% | 3.93% | -5.99% | 30.05% | 9.85% | 11.41% | 14.61% | 31.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between STZ and YUM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 1997 | 0.30 |
Fundamentals
STZ:
$24.46B
YUM:
$41.12B
STZ:
$11.23
YUM:
$6.21
STZ:
12.54
YUM:
23.72
STZ:
7.81
YUM:
10.70
STZ:
2.69
YUM:
4.86
STZ:
$9.14B
YUM:
$8.49B
STZ:
$4.71B
YUM:
$3.88B
STZ:
$3.05B
YUM:
$2.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STZ vs. YUM — Risk / Return Rank
STZ
YUM
STZ vs. YUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STZ | YUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.05 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 0.30 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 0.73 | -1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STZ | YUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 | 0.17 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | 0.33 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.51 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.48 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
STZ vs. YUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STZ drawdown since its inception was -67.39%, roughly equal to the maximum YUM drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STZ and YUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STZ | YUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.39% | -67.69% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -12.41% | -14.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.28% | -16.10% | -35.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.28% | -23.10% | -28.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.53% | -52.17% | -1.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.54% | -11.93% | -33.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.58% | -12.38% | -4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.89% | 5.07% | +9.82% |
Volatility
STZ vs. YUM - Volatility Comparison
Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) at 6.38%. This indicates that STZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STZ | YUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.70% | 6.38% | +2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.49% | 14.94% | +8.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.97% | 21.80% | +8.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 20.43% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 22.74% | +4.20% |
Dividends
STZ vs. YUM - Dividend Comparison
STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than YUM's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 2.90% | 2.95% | 1.77% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 1.58% | 1.70% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 0.65% |
YUM YUM! Brands, Inc. | 1.98% | 1.88% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 1.78% | 1.44% | 1.73% | 1.67% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 41.26% | 2.31% |
Financials
STZ vs. YUM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Brands, Inc. and YUM! Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STZ vs. YUM - Profitability Comparison
STZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 941.60M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.
YUM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 920.00M and revenue of 2.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.7%.
STZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 357.10M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
YUM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 644.00M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.
STZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 477.70M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.
YUM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, YUM! Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STZ and YUM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STZ has higher volatility (8.70%) compared to YUM (6.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STZ dropped -67.39% vs YUM's -67.69%.
YUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STZ and YUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer