PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STXS vs. QCOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STXS vs. QCOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stereotaxis, Inc. (STXS) and QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXS achieves a -21.30% return, which is significantly lower than QCOM's 28.60% return. Over the past 10 years, STXS has underperformed QCOM with an annualized return of 4.46%, while QCOM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.18% annualized return.


STXS

1D
1.69%
1M
-4.74%
YTD
-21.30%
6M
-23.31%
1Y
-19.56%
3Y*
-4.83%
5Y*
-26.66%
10Y*
4.46%

QCOM

1D
0.85%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
28.60%
6M
25.48%
1Y
48.99%
3Y*
24.96%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
18.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXS vs. QCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STXS
Stereotaxis, Inc.
-21.30%0.88%30.29%-15.46%-66.61%21.81%-3.78%389.36%35.12%23.10%
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
28.60%13.84%8.31%35.07%-38.58%22.25%77.08%60.76%-7.59%2.05%

Correlation

The correlation between STXS and QCOM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2004

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STXS:

$178.99M

QCOM:

$233.45B

EPS

STXS:

-$0.23

QCOM:

$9.11

PS Ratio

STXS:

5.44

QCOM:

5.33

PB Ratio

STXS:

19.63

QCOM:

8.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

STXS:

$31.20M

QCOM:

$44.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STXS:

$16.80M

QCOM:

$24.38B

EBITDA (TTM)

STXS:

-$20.72M

QCOM:

$12.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STXS vs. QCOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXS
STXS Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
STXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXS Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
STXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

QCOM
QCOM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXS vs. QCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stereotaxis, Inc. (STXS) and QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STXSQCOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.24

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

1.49

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.62

3.34

-3.97

STXS vs. QCOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXS Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the QCOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXS and QCOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STXSQCOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

1.04

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

0.31

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

0.47

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.16

0.42

-0.59

Drawdowns

STXS vs. QCOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXS drawdown since its inception was -99.68%, which is greater than QCOM's maximum drawdown of -86.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXS and QCOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXSQCOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.68%

-86.75%

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.54%

-33.13%

-18.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.54%

-44.23%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.04%

-44.29%

-41.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.04%

-44.29%

-41.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.88%

-12.93%

-85.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.60%

-32.88%

-49.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.34%

14.70%

+16.64%

Volatility

STXS vs. QCOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Stereotaxis, Inc. (STXS) is 17.07%, while QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) has a volatility of 29.80%. This indicates that STXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXSQCOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.07%

29.80%

-12.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.64%

40.61%

-6.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.17%

47.39%

+9.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.26%

40.86%

+25.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.96%

39.13%

+35.83%

Dividends

STXS vs. QCOM - Dividend Comparison

STXS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
1.65%2.06%2.18%2.18%2.67%1.47%1.69%2.81%4.27%3.50%3.17%3.72%
STXS
Stereotaxis, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

STXS vs. QCOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stereotaxis, Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
6.29M
10.60B
(STXS) Total Revenue
(QCOM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

STXS vs. QCOM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stereotaxis, Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
60.3%
53.8%
Portfolio components
STXS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stereotaxis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.79M and revenue of 6.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.

QCOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported a gross profit of 5.70B and revenue of 10.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.8%.

STXS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stereotaxis, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.98M and revenue of 6.29M, resulting in an operating margin of -95.1%.

QCOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported an operating income of 2.31B and revenue of 10.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.

STXS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stereotaxis, Inc. reported a net income of -6.17M and revenue of 6.29M, resulting in a net margin of -98.1%.

QCOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QUALCOMM Incorporated reported a net income of 7.37B and revenue of 10.60B, resulting in a net margin of 69.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STXS and QCOM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCOM has higher volatility (29.80%) compared to STXS (17.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXS dropped -99.68% vs QCOM's -86.75%.

QCOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STXS and QCOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer