PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STT vs. SCHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STT vs. SCHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Corporation (STT) and The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STT achieves a 27.09% return, which is significantly higher than SCHW's -11.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with STT having a 13.81% annualized return and SCHW not far behind at 13.40%.


STT

1D
0.04%
1M
8.24%
YTD
27.09%
6M
32.15%
1Y
68.67%
3Y*
34.19%
5Y*
17.55%
10Y*
13.81%

SCHW

1D
-0.86%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
-11.23%
6M
-5.92%
1Y
1.07%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
5.26%
10Y*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STT vs. SCHW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STT
State Street Corporation
27.09%35.54%30.18%3.54%-13.75%31.03%-4.76%29.35%-33.97%27.84%
SCHW
The Charles Schwab Corporation
-11.23%36.65%9.17%-15.97%0.11%60.23%13.57%16.38%-18.43%31.15%

Correlation

The correlation between STT and SCHW is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 1989

0.51

The correlation between STT and SCHW shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.65 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

STT:

$10.18

SCHW:

$5.26

PE Ratio

STT:

15.89

SCHW:

16.74

PEG Ratio

STT:

1.61

SCHW:

0.96

PS Ratio

STT:

2.07

SCHW:

6.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

STT:

$22.63B

SCHW:

$24.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STT:

$13.89B

SCHW:

$18.86B

EBITDA (TTM)

STT:

$4.29B

SCHW:

$13.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STT vs. SCHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STT
STT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
STT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
STT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
STT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
STT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHW
SCHW Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SCHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHW Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHW Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STT vs. SCHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Corporation (STT) and The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STTSCHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.03

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.85

0.05

+5.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.82

0.13

+17.69

STT vs. SCHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STT Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the SCHW Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STT and SCHW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STTSCHWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

0.04

+2.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.16

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.40

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.42

-0.12

Drawdowns

STT vs. SCHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STT drawdown since its inception was -82.26%, smaller than the maximum SCHW drawdown of -86.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STT and SCHW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STTSCHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.26%

-86.79%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.79%

-19.83%

+8.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.68%

-27.11%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.45%

-49.70%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.59%

-51.08%

-8.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-17.27%

+16.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.48%

-35.54%

+15.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

8.26%

-4.39%

Volatility

STT vs. SCHW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Corporation (STT) is 6.21%, while The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that STT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STTSCHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

7.73%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.48%

19.69%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.96%

24.04%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.45%

32.24%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.92%

33.42%

-0.50%

Dividends

STT vs. SCHW - Dividend Comparison

STT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than SCHW's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHW
The Charles Schwab Corporation
1.34%1.08%1.35%1.45%1.01%0.86%1.36%1.43%1.11%0.62%0.68%0.73%
STT
State Street Corporation
2.03%2.42%2.18%3.41%3.09%2.34%2.86%2.50%2.82%1.64%1.85%1.99%

Financials

STT vs. SCHW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between State Street Corporation and The Charles Schwab Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
5.59B
3.14B
(STT) Total Revenue
(SCHW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

STT vs. SCHW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between State Street Corporation and The Charles Schwab Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
65.1%
32.7%
Portfolio components
STT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, State Street Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.64B and revenue of 5.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.1%.

SCHW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Charles Schwab Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 3.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

STT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, State Street Corporation reported an operating income of 918.00M and revenue of 5.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.

SCHW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Charles Schwab Corporation reported an operating income of -730.00M and revenue of 3.14B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.2%.

STT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, State Street Corporation reported a net income of 747.00M and revenue of 5.59B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.

SCHW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Charles Schwab Corporation reported a net income of 2.48B and revenue of 3.14B, resulting in a net margin of 78.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STT and SCHW have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHW has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to STT (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STT dropped -82.26% vs SCHW's -86.79%.

STT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STT and SCHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer