STN vs. ROAD
STN (Stantec Inc) and ROAD (Construction Partners, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, STN returned 11.85%/yr vs 25.85%/yr for ROAD. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STN vs. ROAD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STN achieves a -21.89% return, which is significantly lower than ROAD's -2.01% return.
STN
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -15.85%
- YTD
- -21.89%
- 6M
- -22.73%
- 1Y
- -30.32%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
ROAD
- 1D
- -3.80%
- 1M
- -24.28%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- -3.62%
- 3Y*
- 49.37%
- 5Y*
- 25.85%
- 10Y*
- —
STN vs. ROAD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STN Stantec Inc | -21.89% | 21.08% | -1.44% | 68.90% | -13.76% | 75.67% | 16.56% | 31.83% | -10.89% |
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc. | -2.01% | 22.71% | 103.26% | 63.06% | -9.25% | 1.03% | 72.55% | 91.05% | -32.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between STN and ROAD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2018 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
STN:
$8.38B
ROAD:
$5.98B
STN:
$3.98
ROAD:
$2.27
STN:
18.44
ROAD:
46.86
STN:
0.76
ROAD:
0.87
STN:
1.08
ROAD:
1.83
STN:
2.48
ROAD:
6.11
STN:
$7.77B
ROAD:
$3.26B
STN:
$3.11B
ROAD:
$511.53M
STN:
$1.05B
ROAD:
$397.81M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STN vs. ROAD — Risk / Return Rank
STN
ROAD
STN vs. ROAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stantec Inc (STN) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STN | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.03 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | -0.14 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.94 | -0.26 | -1.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STN | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | -0.08 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.57 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.64 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
STN vs. ROAD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STN drawdown since its inception was -67.42%, which is greater than ROAD's maximum drawdown of -54.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STN and ROAD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STN | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.42% | -54.54% | -12.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.66% | -26.55% | -9.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.66% | -33.62% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.66% | -54.54% | +18.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.06% | -24.28% | -10.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.11% | -16.28% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.63% | 14.03% | +1.60% |
Volatility
STN vs. ROAD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Stantec Inc (STN) is 13.19%, while Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) has a volatility of 14.70%. This indicates that STN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STN | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.19% | 14.70% | -1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.93% | 36.78% | -12.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.82% | 47.25% | -19.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.23% | 45.45% | -20.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 48.68% | -23.03% |
Dividends
STN vs. ROAD - Dividend Comparison
STN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while ROAD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STN Stantec Inc | 1.07% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 0.79% | 1.14% | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.55% | 1.91% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 1.69% |
Financials
STN vs. ROAD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stantec Inc and Construction Partners, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STN vs. ROAD - Profitability Comparison
STN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc reported a gross profit of 821.42M and revenue of 2.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.
ROAD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 98.85M and revenue of 769.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.
STN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc reported an operating income of 175.05M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.
ROAD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 37.38M and revenue of 769.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
STN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc reported a net income of 111.09M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
ROAD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 9.18M and revenue of 769.20M, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STN and ROAD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROAD has higher volatility (14.70%) compared to STN (13.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STN dropped -67.42% vs ROAD's -54.54%.
ROAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STN and ROAD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer