STN vs. FLR
STN (Stantec Inc) and FLR (Fluor Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, STN returned 12.56%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for FLR. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STN vs. FLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STN achieves a -21.89% return, which is significantly lower than FLR's 24.96% return. Over the past 10 years, STN has outperformed FLR with an annualized return of 12.56%, while FLR has yielded a comparatively lower 0.33% annualized return.
STN
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -15.85%
- YTD
- -21.89%
- 6M
- -22.73%
- 1Y
- -30.32%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
FLR
- 1D
- 4.12%
- 1M
- 14.34%
- YTD
- 24.96%
- 6M
- 14.23%
- 1Y
- 11.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.94%
- 10Y*
- 0.33%
STN vs. FLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STN Stantec Inc | -21.89% | 21.08% | -1.44% | 68.90% | -13.76% | 75.67% | 16.56% | 31.83% | -20.43% | 12.80% |
FLR Fluor Corporation | 24.96% | -19.65% | 25.91% | 13.01% | 39.93% | 55.10% | -14.55% | -39.54% | -36.61% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between STN and FLR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2005 | 0.38 |
Fundamentals
STN:
$3.98
FLR:
$2.65
STN:
18.44
FLR:
18.68
STN:
0.76
FLR:
0.04
STN:
1.08
FLR:
0.43
STN:
$7.77B
FLR:
$15.19B
STN:
$3.11B
FLR:
-$247.00M
STN:
$1.05B
FLR:
-$276.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STN vs. FLR — Risk / Return Rank
STN
FLR
STN vs. FLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stantec Inc (STN) and Fluor Corporation (FLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STN | FLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.10 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 0.38 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.94 | 0.59 | -2.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STN | FLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | 0.22 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.44 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.01 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.13 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
STN vs. FLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STN drawdown since its inception was -67.42%, smaller than the maximum FLR drawdown of -95.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STN and FLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STN | FLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.42% | -95.89% | +28.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.66% | -30.19% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.66% | -47.63% | +11.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.66% | -47.63% | +11.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.66% | -94.16% | +58.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.06% | -40.08% | +5.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.11% | -41.62% | +24.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.63% | 19.45% | -3.82% |
Volatility
STN vs. FLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Stantec Inc (STN) is 13.19%, while Fluor Corporation (FLR) has a volatility of 21.30%. This indicates that STN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STN | FLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.19% | 21.30% | -8.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.93% | 34.11% | -10.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.82% | 52.24% | -24.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.23% | 45.18% | -19.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 57.67% | -32.02% |
Dividends
STN vs. FLR - Dividend Comparison
STN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while FLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLR Fluor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 3.87% | 2.61% | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.78% |
STN Stantec Inc | 1.07% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 0.79% | 1.14% | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.55% | 1.91% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 1.69% |
Financials
STN vs. FLR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stantec Inc and Fluor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STN vs. FLR - Profitability Comparison
STN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc reported a gross profit of 821.42M and revenue of 2.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.
FLR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a gross profit of 13.00M and revenue of 3.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.4%.
STN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc reported an operating income of 175.05M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.
FLR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported an operating income of 92.00M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.
STN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc reported a net income of 111.09M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
FLR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a net income of 160.00M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STN and FLR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLR has higher volatility (21.30%) compared to STN (13.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STN dropped -67.42% vs FLR's -95.89%.
FLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STN and FLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer