STM vs. MRVL
STM (STMicroelectronics N.V.) and MRVL (Marvell Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, STM returned 30.73%/yr vs 41.26%/yr for MRVL. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
STM vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STM achieves a 189.99% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 240.32% return. Over the past 10 years, STM has underperformed MRVL with an annualized return of 30.73%, while MRVL has yielded a comparatively higher 41.26% annualized return.
STM
- 1D
- 6.07%
- 1M
- 26.77%
- YTD
- 189.99%
- 6M
- 191.66%
- 1Y
- 166.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.86%
- 5Y*
- 16.11%
- 10Y*
- 30.73%
MRVL
- 1D
- 9.63%
- 1M
- 69.78%
- YTD
- 240.32%
- 6M
- 214.35%
- 1Y
- 323.75%
- 3Y*
- 69.41%
- 5Y*
- 42.37%
- 10Y*
- 41.26%
STM vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 189.99% | 5.28% | -49.67% | 41.66% | -26.76% | 32.39% | 38.91% | 96.34% | -35.65% | 94.77% |
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 240.32% | -22.82% | 83.79% | 63.68% | -57.48% | 84.62% | 80.25% | 65.74% | -23.62% | 56.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between STM and MRVL is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2000 | 0.51 |
The correlation between STM and MRVL shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
STM:
$69.38B
MRVL:
$258.03B
STM:
$0.15
MRVL:
$2.90
STM:
484.31
MRVL:
99.74
STM:
5.65
MRVL:
28.91
STM:
3.91
MRVL:
14.17
STM:
$12.40B
MRVL:
$8.72B
STM:
$4.20B
MRVL:
$4.41B
STM:
$2.32B
MRVL:
$4.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STM vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank
STM
MRVL
STM vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STM | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.59 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.62 | 12.37 | -7.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.54 | 28.64 | -18.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STM | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | 4.70 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.69 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.80 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.23 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
STM vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STM drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, roughly equal to the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STM and MRVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STM | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.40% | -91.60% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.35% | -26.36% | -9.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.66% | -60.79% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.66% | -61.88% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.66% | -61.88% | -4.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.90% | -8.72% | +2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.22% | -46.77% | -8.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.91% | 11.37% | +4.54% |
Volatility
STM vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) is 24.06%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 38.50%. This indicates that STM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STM | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.06% | 38.50% | -14.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.48% | 54.32% | -14.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.78% | 69.56% | -16.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.92% | 61.51% | -16.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.28% | 51.77% | -7.49% |
Dividends
STM vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison
STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than MRVL's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 0.08% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 0.65% | 0.21% | 0.50% | 0.90% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.73% | 2.72% |
STM STMicroelectronics N.V. | 0.48% | 1.39% | 1.32% | 0.48% | 0.67% | 0.45% | 0.50% | 0.89% | 1.73% | 0.98% | 2.10% | 5.11% |
Financials
STM vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between STMicroelectronics N.V. and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STM vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison
STM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a gross profit of 1.05B and revenue of 3.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.8%.
MRVL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.
STM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported an operating income of 96.00M and revenue of 3.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
MRVL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
STM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a net income of 37.00M and revenue of 3.10B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
MRVL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STM and MRVL have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRVL has higher volatility (38.50%) compared to STM (24.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STM dropped -94.40% vs MRVL's -91.60%.
MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STM and MRVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer