STAG vs. NMFC

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

STAG (STAG Industrial, Inc.) and NMFC (New Mountain Finance Corporation) are both stocks. STAG operates in REIT - Industrial (Real Estate), while NMFC operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, STAG returned 9.93%/yr vs 6.08%/yr for NMFC. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

STAG vs. NMFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) and New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STAG achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than NMFC's -11.79% return. Over the past 10 years, STAG has outperformed NMFC with an annualized return of 9.93%, while NMFC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.08% annualized return.

STAG

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -4.65%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 6M: -1.21%
• 1Y: 4.41%
• 3Y*: 4.98%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: 9.93%

NMFC

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -5.92%
• YTD: -11.79%
• 6M: -13.53%
• 1Y: -16.84%
• 3Y*: -3.49%
• 5Y*: -0.05%
• 10Y*: 6.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STAG vs. NMFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
STAG STAG Industrial, Inc.	2.13%	13.30%	-10.34%	26.73%	-29.66%	59.10%	4.18%	33.20%	-3.81%	20.68%
NMFC New Mountain Finance Corporation	-11.79%	-7.17%	-0.95%	15.47%	-0.55%	31.94%	-7.13%	20.64%	2.78%	5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between STAG and NMFC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2011	0.32

The correlation between STAG and NMFC shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS STAG : $1.30 NMFC : $328.53
PE Ratio STAG : 28.66 NMFC : 0.02
PS Ratio STAG : 8.10 NMFC : 2.30
Total Revenue (TTM) STAG : $863.82M NMFC : $315.55M
Gross Profit (TTM) STAG : $356.54M NMFC : $203.95M
EBITDA (TTM) STAG : $598.36M NMFC : $106.53M

Return for Risk

STAG vs. NMFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STAG

STAG Risk / Return Rank: 48
STAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
STAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
STAG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
STAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
STAG Martin Ratio Rank: 54

NMFC

NMFC Risk / Return Rank: 13
NMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
NMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
NMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 14
NMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
NMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STAG vs. NMFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) and New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STAG	NMFC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	-0.75	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.46	-0.98	+1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	0.89	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	-0.69	+1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.14	-1.35	+2.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STAG vs. NMFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STAG Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is higher than the NMFC Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STAG and NMFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STAG	NMFC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23	-0.75	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	-0.00	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.24	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.31	+0.21

Drawdowns

STAG vs. NMFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STAG drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, smaller than the maximum NMFC drawdown of -64.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STAG and NMFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	STAG	NMFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.08%	-64.16%	+19.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.44%	-24.56%	+15.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.59%	-27.77%	+3.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.22%	-27.77%	-14.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.08%	-64.16%	+19.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.51%	-23.29%	+15.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.51%	-5.45%	-5.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.88%	12.48%	-8.60%

Volatility

STAG vs. NMFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) is 4.82%, while New Mountain Finance Corporation (NMFC) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that STAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STAG	NMFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.82%	6.73%	-1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.71%	18.23%	-4.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.36%	22.67%	-3.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.40%	18.54%	+4.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.16%	25.91%	+0.25%

Dividends

STAG vs. NMFC - Dividend Comparison

STAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than NMFC's 16.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NMFC New Mountain Finance Corporation	16.43%	13.90%	12.17%	11.40%	9.86%	8.76%	10.92%	9.90%	10.81%	10.04%	9.65%	10.45%
STAG STAG Industrial, Inc.	3.38%	4.05%	4.38%	3.74%	4.52%	3.02%	4.60%	4.53%	5.71%	5.14%	5.82%	7.40%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STAG and NMFC in my portfolio?

STAG and NMFC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STAG or NMFC?

NMFC has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to STAG (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STAG dropped -45.08% vs NMFC's -64.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.