SRLN vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SRLN (State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by State Street, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. SRLN is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRLN returned 4.52%/yr vs 9.77%/yr for QYLD. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SRLN charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

SRLN vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRLN achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SRLN has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 4.52%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.77% annualized return.

SRLN

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 5.41%
• 3Y*: 7.64%
• 5Y*: 4.55%
• 10Y*: 4.52%

QYLD

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 7.05%
• 6M: 8.87%
• 1Y: 22.45%
• 3Y*: 13.42%
• 5Y*: 8.24%
• 10Y*: 9.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRLN vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF	0.63%	6.77%	8.43%	11.62%	-5.30%	4.49%	3.13%	10.03%	-0.66%	3.39%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.05%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	10.41%	8.72%	22.69%	-3.07%	18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SRLN and QYLD is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013	0.37

The correlation between SRLN and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SRLN vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SRLN	QYLD
Communication Services	91.8%	15.8%
Industrials	8.2%	2.8%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	0.6%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	53.8%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

SRLN vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRLN

SRLN Risk / Return Rank: 58
SRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 80
SRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
SRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 42

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 89
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRLN vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SRLN	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.56	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	3.53	-0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.57	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	4.54	-2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.17	26.31	-20.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SRLN vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRLN and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SRLN	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	2.56	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.17	0.56	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	0.63	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.59	+0.11

Drawdowns

SRLN vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRLN drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRLN and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SRLN	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.29%	-24.75%	+2.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.26%	-4.97%	+1.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.26%	-19.06%	+14.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.93%	-24.61%	+16.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.29%	-24.75%	+2.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-0.83%	+0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.10%	-3.83%	+2.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	0.86%	+0.02%

Volatility

SRLN vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) is 0.46%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that SRLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SRLN	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.46%	2.86%	-2.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.64%	7.44%	-4.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89%	8.84%	-5.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.91%	14.73%	-10.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.06%	15.51%	-9.45%

SRLN vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRLN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

SRLN vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

SRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.50%, less than QYLD's 11.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.55%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF	7.50%	7.67%	8.58%	8.44%	5.72%	4.45%	4.91%	5.39%	4.98%	4.01%	3.94%	4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SRLN and QYLD in my portfolio?

SRLN and QYLD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SRLN or QYLD?

QYLD has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to SRLN (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRLN dropped -22.29% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, SRLN or QYLD?

On 10-year performance, QYLD leads with 9.77% vs 4.52% for SRLN. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SRLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SRLN or QYLD?

Over the 10-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 9.77% return vs 4.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SRLN or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SRLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SRLN or QYLD?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.55%, compared with 7.50% for SRLN.

What is the main difference between SRLN and QYLD?

SRLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SRLN and 0.60% for QYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.