SRLN vs. BXSL

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SRLN (State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF) is Bank Loan fund actively managed by State Street, while BXSL (Blackstone Secured Lending Fund) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, SRLN returned 7.64%/yr vs 7.34%/yr for BXSL. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SRLN vs. BXSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRLN achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly higher than BXSL's -8.16% return.

SRLN

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 5.41%
• 3Y*: 7.64%
• 5Y*: 4.55%
• 10Y*: 4.52%

BXSL

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -3.23%
• YTD: -8.16%
• 6M: -11.97%
• 1Y: -17.83%
• 3Y*: 7.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRLN vs. BXSL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF	0.63%	6.77%	8.43%	11.62%	-5.30%	0.60%
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	-8.16%	-9.36%	29.02%	37.82%	-26.03%	32.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SRLN and BXSL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021	0.35

Return for Risk

SRLN vs. BXSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRLN

SRLN Risk / Return Rank: 58
SRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 80
SRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
SRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 42

BXSL

BXSL Risk / Return Rank: 11
BXSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
BXSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
BXSL Omega Ratio Rank: 11
BXSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
BXSL Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRLN vs. BXSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SRLN	BXSL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	-0.89	+2.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	-1.25	+4.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	0.87	+0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	-0.76	+2.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.17	-1.15	+7.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SRLN vs. BXSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the BXSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRLN and BXSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SRLN	BXSL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	-0.89	+2.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.30	+0.40

Drawdowns

SRLN vs. BXSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRLN drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum BXSL drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRLN and BXSL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SRLN	BXSL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.29%	-36.80%	+14.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.26%	-23.47%	+20.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.26%	-24.21%	+19.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-22.04%	+21.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.10%	-14.14%	+13.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	15.54%	-14.66%

Volatility

SRLN vs. BXSL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) is 0.46%, while Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that SRLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BXSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SRLN	BXSL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.46%	5.43%	-4.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.64%	16.25%	-13.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89%	20.09%	-17.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.91%	23.73%	-19.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.06%	23.73%	-17.67%

Dividends

SRLN vs. BXSL - Dividend Comparison

SRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.50%, less than BXSL's 13.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund	13.16%	11.70%	9.53%	10.64%	13.02%	1.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF	7.50%	7.67%	8.58%	8.44%	5.72%	4.45%	4.91%	5.39%	4.98%	4.01%	3.94%	4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SRLN and BXSL in my portfolio?

SRLN and BXSL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SRLN or BXSL?

BXSL has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to SRLN (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRLN dropped -22.29% vs BXSL's -36.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SRLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.