SPYV vs. VT
SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYV returned 11.83%/yr vs 12.61%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
SPYV vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYV achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 9.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYV has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 11.83%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.61% annualized return.
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
VT
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
SPYV vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 6.98% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 9.77% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYV and VT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SPYV and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYV vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYV
VT
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
SPYV
VT
Financial Services
SPYV
VT
Healthcare
SPYV
VT
Consumer Cyclical
SPYV
VT
Industrials
SPYV
VT
Consumer Defensive
SPYV
VT
Energy
SPYV
VT
Utilities
SPYV
VT
Basic Materials
SPYV
VT
Real Estate
SPYV
VT
Communication Services
SPYV
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYV vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
SPYV
VT
SPYV vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYV | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 2.64 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.39 | 11.68 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYV | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 1.96 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.66 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.73 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.43 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
SPYV vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYV drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYV and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYV | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.45% | -50.27% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.22% | -9.67% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.54% | -16.51% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | -26.38% | +8.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.89% | -34.24% | -2.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -3.06% | +1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.71% | -7.02% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 2.19% | -0.57% |
Volatility
SPYV vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is 2.28%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that SPYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYV | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.28% | 4.55% | -2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.18% | 10.67% | -3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.91% | 13.10% | -3.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 16.10% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 17.26% | -0.31% |
SPYV vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYV vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than VT's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYV and VT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VT has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to SPYV (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYV dropped -58.45% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.61% vs 11.83% for SPYV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VT.
SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.63% for VT.
SPYV is categorized as S&P 500, while VT is Global Equities. SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYV and 0.06% for VT.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYV and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer