SPYV vs. TBLL
SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) and TBLL (Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index, while TBLL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPYV returned 10.75%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for TBLL. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. SPYV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for TBLL.
Performance
SPYV vs. TBLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYV achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly higher than TBLL's 1.48% return.
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 7.88%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
TBLL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYV vs. TBLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 6.98% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 14.10% |
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 1.48% | 4.21% | 5.11% | 5.01% | 1.11% | -0.01% | 0.93% | 2.20% | 1.85% | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYV and TBLL is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2017 | -0.07 |
The correlation between SPYV and TBLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPYV vs. TBLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYV
TBLL
Technology
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
SPYV
TBLL
-
Financial Services
SPYV
TBLL
Healthcare
SPYV
TBLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
SPYV
TBLL
-
Industrials
SPYV
TBLL
-
Consumer Defensive
SPYV
TBLL
-
Energy
SPYV
TBLL
-
Utilities
SPYV
TBLL
-
Basic Materials
SPYV
TBLL
-
Real Estate
SPYV
TBLL
-
Communication Services
SPYV
TBLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYV vs. TBLL — Risk / Return Rank
SPYV
TBLL
SPYV vs. TBLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYV | TBLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -18.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -214.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 102.42 | -101.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 414.75 | -411.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.39 | 3,515.41 | -3,503.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYV | TBLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 20.94 | -18.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 7.56 | -6.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 4.26 | -3.84 |
Drawdowns
SPYV vs. TBLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYV drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than TBLL's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYV and TBLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYV | TBLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.45% | -0.63% | -57.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.22% | -0.01% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.54% | -0.36% | -17.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.89% | -0.36% | -17.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | 0.00% | -1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.71% | -0.14% | -8.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 0.00% | +1.62% |
Volatility
SPYV vs. TBLL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) has a higher volatility of 2.28% compared to Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) at 0.04%. This indicates that SPYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYV | TBLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.28% | 0.04% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.18% | 0.12% | +7.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.91% | 0.19% | +9.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 0.45% | +13.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 0.56% | +16.39% |
SPYV vs. TBLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TBLL's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYV vs. TBLL - Dividend Comparison
SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than TBLL's 3.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF | 3.81% | 4.08% | 4.99% | 4.63% | 1.37% | 0.03% | 0.80% | 2.08% | 1.69% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYV and TBLL have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYV has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to TBLL (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYV dropped -58.45% vs TBLL's -0.63%.
On 5-year performance, SPYV leads with 10.75% vs 3.36% for TBLL. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, TBLL has been the lower-risk option at 0.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 10.75% return vs 3.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for TBLL.
TBLL has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 1.70% for SPYV.
SPYV is categorized as S&P 500, while TBLL is Ultrashort Bond. SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while TBLL tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYV and 0.08% for TBLL.
TBLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.94 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYV and TBLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer