PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYV vs. IWMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYV vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYV achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 10.55% return.


SPYV

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.75%
YTD
6.98%
6M
7.88%
1Y
20.07%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
11.83%

IWMY

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
10.55%
6M
8.47%
1Y
19.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYV vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
6.98%13.18%12.24%16.63%
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
10.55%10.18%5.56%10.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYV and IWMY is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023

0.73

The correlation between SPYV and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYV vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYV vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYVIWMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.21

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

1.71

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.39

5.59

+6.80

SPYV vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYV and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYVIWMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

1.23

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.90

-0.48

Drawdowns

SPYV vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYV drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than IWMY's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYV and IWMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYVIWMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.45%

-18.72%

-39.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.22%

-11.57%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-2.89%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.71%

-2.98%

-5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

3.53%

-1.91%

Volatility

SPYV vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is 2.28%, while Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that SPYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYVIWMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

6.26%

-3.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.18%

13.20%

-6.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.91%

16.15%

-6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.41%

15.90%

-1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

15.90%

+1.05%

SPYV vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYV vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than IWMY's 46.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
46.29%63.33%107.92%11.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.70%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYV and IWMY have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWMY has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to SPYV (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYV dropped -58.45% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

On 1-year performance, SPYV leads with 20.07% vs 19.66% for IWMY. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 20.07% return vs 19.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 46.29%, compared with 1.70% for SPYV.

SPYV is categorized as S&P 500, while IWMY is Options Trading. SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while IWMY tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYV and 0.99% for IWMY.

SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYV and IWMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer