PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYM vs. SPDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYM vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYM has outperformed SPDW with an annualized return of 15.40%, while SPDW has yielded a comparatively lower 10.06% annualized return.


SPYM

1D
0.24%
1M
0.23%
YTD
8.75%
6M
8.78%
1Y
24.91%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
15.40%

SPDW

1D
0.99%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
12.18%
6M
14.96%
1Y
27.89%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYM vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
8.75%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
12.18%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%9.90%22.41%-14.22%25.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYM and SPDW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2007

0.73

The correlation between SPYM and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYM vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYM
SPDW

Technology

38.5%
13.7%

Financial Services

11.1%
22.9%

Communication Services

10.6%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
7.8%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.3%

Industrials

7.6%
19.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
5.7%

Energy

3.2%
5.5%

Utilities

2.5%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.5%

Basic Materials

1.7%
7.3%

Technology

SPYM
38.5%
SPDW
13.7%

Financial Services

SPYM
11.1%
SPDW
22.9%

Communication Services

SPYM
10.6%
SPDW
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYM
9.9%
SPDW
7.8%

Healthcare

SPYM
8.4%
SPDW
8.3%

Industrials

SPYM
7.6%
SPDW
19.2%

Consumer Defensive

SPYM
4.6%
SPDW
5.7%

Energy

SPYM
3.2%
SPDW
5.5%

Utilities

SPYM
2.5%
SPDW
3.3%

Real Estate

SPYM
1.8%
SPDW
2.5%

Basic Materials

SPYM
1.7%
SPDW
7.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYM vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYM vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYMSPDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.43

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

9.42

+3.55

SPYM vs. SPDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the SPDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYM and SPDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYMSPDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

1.74

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.54

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.58

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.23

+0.38

Drawdowns

SPYM vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and SPDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYMSPDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.46%

-60.02%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-11.55%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-13.53%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.48%

-30.21%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

-34.98%

+1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-3.30%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-12.90%

+5.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.97%

-1.05%

Volatility

SPYM vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) is 3.72%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that SPYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYMSPDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

6.07%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

13.76%

-4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.07%

16.09%

-4.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

16.58%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

17.30%

+0.72%

SPYM vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYM vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison

SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than SPDW's 2.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
2.94%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYM and SPDW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPDW has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to SPYM (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs SPDW's -60.02%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.40% vs 10.06% for SPDW. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.40% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SPDW.

SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 1.02% for SPYM.

SPYM is categorized as S&P 500, while SPDW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index, while SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for SPYM and 0.04% for SPDW.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYM and SPDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer