PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYM vs. PRGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYM vs. PRGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYM achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly lower than PRGSX's 16.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPYM having a 15.40% annualized return and PRGSX not far ahead at 16.13%.


SPYM

1D
0.24%
1M
0.23%
YTD
8.75%
6M
8.78%
1Y
24.91%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
15.40%

PRGSX

1D
-5.35%
1M
0.01%
YTD
16.26%
6M
16.21%
1Y
34.05%
3Y*
21.75%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
16.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYM vs. PRGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
8.75%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%
PRGSX
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund
16.26%21.42%16.80%25.70%-28.01%9.81%52.29%35.84%-4.51%32.64%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYM and PRGSX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005

0.82

The correlation between SPYM and PRGSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYM vs. PRGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PRGSX
PRGSX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PRGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYM vs. PRGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) and T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYMPRGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.34

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.77

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

11.24

+1.74

SPYM vs. PRGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the PRGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYM and PRGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYMPRGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

1.88

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.44

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.82

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.52

+0.09

Drawdowns

SPYM vs. PRGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYM drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, smaller than the maximum PRGSX drawdown of -64.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYM and PRGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYMPRGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.46%

-64.06%

+9.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-12.77%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.72%

-21.13%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.48%

-38.11%

+13.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

-38.11%

+4.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-6.08%

+3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-13.48%

+6.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

3.14%

-1.22%

Volatility

SPYM vs. PRGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) is 3.72%, while T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that SPYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYMPRGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

7.75%

-4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

15.88%

-6.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.07%

18.76%

-6.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

19.80%

-2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

19.84%

-1.82%

SPYM vs. PRGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYM has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGSX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYM vs. PRGSX - Dividend Comparison

SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than PRGSX's 8.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRGSX
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund
8.26%9.60%6.73%0.27%0.00%13.67%5.67%2.21%5.81%0.03%0.63%0.33%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SPYM and PRGSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRGSX has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to SPYM (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYM dropped -54.46% vs PRGSX's -64.06%.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYM and PRGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer