SPYD vs. CGDV
SPYD (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYD is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Index, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. SPYD is passively managed, while CGDV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SPYD returned 13.94%/yr vs 24.27%/yr for CGDV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPYD charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.
Performance
SPYD vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYD achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's 10.15% return.
SPYD
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 6M
- 13.02%
- 1Y
- 17.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
CGDV
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYD vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 11.34% | 4.65% | 15.34% | 3.91% | -0.46% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 10.15% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -2.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYD and CGDV is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SPYD and CGDV has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SPYD vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYD
CGDV
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
SPYD
CGDV
Consumer Defensive
SPYD
CGDV
Financial Services
SPYD
CGDV
Utilities
SPYD
CGDV
Energy
SPYD
CGDV
Consumer Cyclical
SPYD
CGDV
Healthcare
SPYD
CGDV
Communication Services
SPYD
CGDV
Basic Materials
SPYD
CGDV
Technology
SPYD
CGDV
Industrials
SPYD
CGDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYD vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank
SPYD
CGDV
SPYD vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYD | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.44 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.84 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.22 | 13.37 | -6.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYD | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 2.34 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.21 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
SPYD vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYD drawdown since its inception was -46.42%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYD and CGDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYD | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.42% | -21.82% | -24.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | -9.75% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -14.28% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -2.22% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.16% | -3.61% | -2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.07% | +0.35% |
Volatility
SPYD vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) is 2.68%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that SPYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYD | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.68% | 3.60% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.74% | 9.47% | -1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.65% | 11.85% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 15.51% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 15.51% | +4.27% |
SPYD vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYD has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYD vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison
SPYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than CGDV's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.19% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 4.17% | 4.52% | 4.31% | 4.66% | 5.01% | 3.68% | 4.95% | 4.42% | 4.75% | 4.63% | 4.34% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYD and CGDV have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGDV has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to SPYD (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYD dropped -46.42% vs CGDV's -21.82%.
On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 24.27% vs 13.94% for SPYD. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPYD has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 24.27% return vs 13.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.
SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.17%, compared with 1.19% for CGDV.
SPYD is categorized as S&P 500, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SPYD and 0.33% for CGDV.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYD and CGDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer