SPY vs. PAAA
SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) and PAAA (PGIM AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while PAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by PGIM. SPY is passively managed, while PAAA is actively managed. Over the past year, SPY returned 24.79% vs 5.16% for PAAA. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPY charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for PAAA.
Performance
SPY vs. PAAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPY achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly higher than PAAA's 2.10% return.
SPY
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 24.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.27%
PAAA
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPY vs. PAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.70% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 5.14% |
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF | 2.10% | 5.37% | 7.47% | 3.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPY and PAAA is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2023 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPY vs. PAAA — Risk / Return Rank
SPY
PAAA
SPY vs. PAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPY | PAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -18.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 6.56 | -5.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 29.79 | -26.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.93 | 184.52 | -171.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPY | PAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 10.91 | -8.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 6.79 | -6.21 |
Drawdowns
SPY vs. PAAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPY drawdown since its inception was -55.19%, which is greater than PAAA's maximum drawdown of -1.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPY and PAAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPY | PAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.19% | -1.04% | -54.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.88% | -0.17% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | 0.00% | -2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.04% | -0.02% | -9.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 0.03% | +1.89% |
Volatility
SPY vs. PAAA - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) at 0.12%. This indicates that SPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPY | PAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 0.12% | +3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 0.36% | +8.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 0.48% | +11.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 0.97% | +16.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 0.97% | +16.99% |
SPY vs. PAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPY has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PAAA's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPY vs. PAAA - Dividend Comparison
SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than PAAA's 4.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF | 4.88% | 5.12% | 5.88% | 2.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPY and PAAA have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to PAAA (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPY dropped -55.19% vs PAAA's -1.04%.
On 1-year performance, SPY leads with 24.79% vs 5.16% for PAAA. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, PAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPY has performed better with a 24.79% return vs 5.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for PAAA.
PAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 1.00% for SPY.
SPY is categorized as S&P 500, while PAAA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: State Street and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPY and 0.19% for PAAA.
PAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.91 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPY and PAAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer