PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPY vs. IBTM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPY vs. IBTM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPY is traded in USD, while IBTM.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IBTM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPY achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly higher than IBTM.L's -1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SPY has outperformed IBTM.L with an annualized return of 15.27%, while IBTM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.71% annualized return.


SPY

1D
0.23%
1M
0.22%
YTD
8.70%
6M
8.75%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
15.27%

IBTM.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
-1.33%
6M
-0.69%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
2.61%
5Y*
-1.15%
10Y*
0.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPY vs. IBTM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
8.70%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%
IBTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
-1.33%8.50%-0.23%2.90%-14.92%-2.66%9.27%9.73%0.47%2.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SPY and IBTM.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

-0.07

The correlation between SPY and IBTM.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPY vs. IBTM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTM.L
IBTM.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IBTM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPY vs. IBTM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPYIBTM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.12

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

0.94

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.93

2.78

+10.15

SPY vs. IBTM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the IBTM.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPY and IBTM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPYIBTM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

0.69

+1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

-0.14

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.09

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.02

+0.56

Drawdowns

SPY vs. IBTM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPY drawdown since its inception was -55.19%, roughly equal to the maximum IBTM.L drawdown of -53.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPY and IBTM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYIBTM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.19%

-53.26%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-4.18%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-7.61%

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-21.13%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

-23.64%

-10.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-21.09%

+18.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-29.36%

+20.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.41%

+0.51%

Volatility

SPY vs. IBTM.L - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) at 1.91%. This indicates that SPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYIBTM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

1.91%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

4.14%

+5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

5.71%

+6.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

8.51%

+8.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

7.83%

+10.13%

SPY vs. IBTM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPY has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTM.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPY vs. IBTM.L - Dividend Comparison

SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than IBTM.L's 4.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.36%4.19%3.94%3.16%1.96%1.14%1.69%2.53%2.34%2.02%1.79%1.97%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPY and IBTM.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTM.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTM.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPY.

SPY is categorized as S&P 500, while IBTM.L is Government Bonds. SPY tracks S&P 500 Index, while IBTM.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SPY and 0.07% for IBTM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPY and IBTM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer