SPXT vs. FBMPX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SPXT (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF) and FBMPX (Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio) are both funds - SPXT is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-Information Technology Index, while FBMPX is a Communications Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, SPXT returned 11.31%/yr vs 16.89%/yr for FBMPX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FBMPX.

Performance

SPXT vs. FBMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXT achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than FBMPX's 6.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXT has underperformed FBMPX with an annualized return of 11.31%, while FBMPX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.89% annualized return.

SPXT

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -1.24%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 4.93%
• 1Y: 14.96%
• 3Y*: 16.16%
• 5Y*: 9.30%
• 10Y*: 11.31%

FBMPX

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: -3.35%
• YTD: 6.97%
• 6M: 7.58%
• 1Y: 32.45%
• 3Y*: 33.06%
• 5Y*: 13.51%
• 10Y*: 16.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXT vs. FBMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SPXT ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF	3.18%	15.10%	19.93%	16.23%	-14.24%	26.36%	10.44%	26.88%	-7.06%	16.99%
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio	6.97%	37.07%	35.98%	56.85%	-38.30%	15.97%	35.48%	33.14%	-3.52%	12.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXT and FBMPX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015	0.64

The correlation between SPXT and FBMPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPXT vs. FBMPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPXT	FBMPX
Financial Services	18.0%	-
Communication Services	17.0%	83.1%
Consumer Cyclical	15.9%	2.8%
Healthcare	13.5%	0.7%
Industrials	12.2%	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.3%	-
Energy	5.1%	-
Utilities	4.1%	-
Real Estate	2.9%	-
Basic Materials	2.8%	-
Technology	1.0%	13.1%

Return for Risk

SPXT vs. FBMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXT

SPXT Risk / Return Rank: 46
SPXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SPXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SPXT Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SPXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
SPXT Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FBMPX

FBMPX Risk / Return Rank: 38
FBMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FBMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FBMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FBMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FBMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXT vs. FBMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) and Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SPXT	FBMPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	1.81	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	2.49	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.32	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	2.06	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.25	7.74	+0.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SPXT vs. FBMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the FBMPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXT and FBMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPXT	FBMPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	1.81	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.58	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.77	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.65	+0.08

Drawdowns

SPXT vs. FBMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXT drawdown since its inception was -34.38%, smaller than the maximum FBMPX drawdown of -61.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXT and FBMPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPXT	FBMPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.38%	-61.77%	+27.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.90%	-16.90%	+9.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.58%	-23.20%	+7.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.47%	-47.42%	+25.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.38%	-47.42%	+13.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.06%	-5.72%	+3.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.14%	-10.63%	+6.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	4.48%	-2.66%

Volatility

SPXT vs. FBMPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) is 2.80%, while Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio (FBMPX) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that SPXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPXT	FBMPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.80%	5.19%	-2.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.69%	14.24%	-6.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.39%	19.21%	-8.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.73%	23.28%	-8.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.24%	21.98%	-5.74%

SPXT vs. FBMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPXT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FBMPX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPXT vs. FBMPX - Dividend Comparison

SPXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than FBMPX's 12.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBMPX Fidelity Select Communication Services Portfolio	12.52%	8.09%	7.05%	0.00%	0.00%	5.88%	3.74%	35.43%	15.29%	5.53%	7.50%	7.29%
SPXT ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF	1.38%	1.38%	1.29%	1.53%	1.86%	1.15%	1.63%	1.63%	2.03%	1.55%	2.67%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPXT and FBMPX in my portfolio?

SPXT and FBMPX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPXT or FBMPX?

FBMPX has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to SPXT (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXT dropped -34.38% vs FBMPX's -61.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.