PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPXC vs. HBM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SPXC vs. HBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPX Corporation (SPXC) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPXC achieves a 14.94% return, which is significantly lower than HBM's 31.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXC has outperformed HBM with an annualized return of 30.96%, while HBM has yielded a comparatively lower 18.60% annualized return.


SPXC

1D
0.94%
1M
13.37%
YTD
14.94%
6M
11.54%
1Y
45.81%
3Y*
39.57%
5Y*
30.08%
10Y*
30.96%

HBM

1D
1.75%
1M
4.36%
YTD
31.58%
6M
50.45%
1Y
171.66%
3Y*
77.46%
5Y*
30.42%
10Y*
18.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPXC vs. HBM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPXC
SPX Corporation
14.94%37.48%44.06%53.86%10.00%9.42%7.19%81.65%-10.77%32.34%
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
31.58%145.46%47.03%9.24%-29.87%3.82%69.50%-11.77%-46.20%54.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SPXC and HBM is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2009

0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SPXC:

$11.62B

HBM:

$10.41B

EPS

SPXC:

$5.19

HBM:

$1.65

PE Ratio

SPXC:

44.32

HBM:

15.79

PEG Ratio

SPXC:

0.01

HBM:

0.11

PS Ratio

SPXC:

4.78

HBM:

4.39

PB Ratio

SPXC:

5.08

HBM:

2.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

SPXC:

$2.35B

HBM:

$2.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SPXC:

$909.30M

HBM:

$828.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

SPXC:

$475.30M

HBM:

$1.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPXC vs. HBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPXC
SPXC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

HBM
HBM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPXC vs. HBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPX Corporation (SPXC) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPXCHBMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.41

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

4.78

-2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.09

15.13

-10.04

SPXC vs. HBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPXC Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the HBM Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPXC and HBM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPXCHBMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.96

-1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.55

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.32

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.20

+0.14

Drawdowns

SPXC vs. HBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPXC drawdown since its inception was -81.12%, smaller than the maximum HBM drawdown of -92.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXC and HBM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPXCHBMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.12%

-92.21%

+11.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.15%

-36.16%

+13.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.54%

-41.11%

+7.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.32%

-63.33%

+25.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.26%

-86.34%

+36.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.39%

-18.07%

+12.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.02%

-52.50%

+23.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.03%

11.40%

-2.37%

Volatility

SPXC vs. HBM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPX Corporation (SPXC) is 10.68%, while Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) has a volatility of 25.29%. This indicates that SPXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPXCHBMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

25.29%

-14.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.88%

46.90%

-19.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.54%

58.55%

-22.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.14%

55.36%

-20.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.46%

58.79%

-21.33%

Dividends

SPXC vs. HBM - Dividend Comparison

SPXC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
0.05%0.07%0.17%0.31%0.32%0.22%0.21%0.36%0.38%0.23%0.35%0.52%
SPXC
SPX Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%386.22%

Financials

SPXC vs. HBM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SPX Corporation and Hudbay Minerals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M20222023202420252026
566.80M
745.43M
(SPXC) Total Revenue
(HBM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SPXC vs. HBM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SPX Corporation and Hudbay Minerals Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
40.7%
45.7%
Portfolio components
SPXC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SPX Corporation reported a gross profit of 230.60M and revenue of 566.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.

HBM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a gross profit of 340.81M and revenue of 745.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.7%.

SPXC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SPX Corporation reported an operating income of 87.70M and revenue of 566.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.5%.

HBM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported an operating income of 297.62M and revenue of 745.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 39.9%.

SPXC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SPX Corporation reported a net income of 59.90M and revenue of 566.80M, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

HBM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a net income of 187.76M and revenue of 745.43M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPXC and HBM have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HBM has higher volatility (25.29%) compared to SPXC (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPXC dropped -81.12% vs HBM's -92.21%.

HBM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPXC and HBM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer