SPMO vs. LUG.TO
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while LUG.TO (Lundin Gold Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 20.38%/yr vs 31.76%/yr for LUG.TO. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SPMO vs. LUG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPMO is traded in USD, while LUG.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LUG.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 24.29% return, which is significantly higher than LUG.TO's -27.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has underperformed LUG.TO with an annualized return of 20.38%, while LUG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 31.76% annualized return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 24.29%
- 6M
- 22.86%
- 1Y
- 39.53%
- 3Y*
- 40.28%
- 5Y*
- 23.06%
- 10Y*
- 20.38%
LUG.TO
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -15.65%
- YTD
- -27.87%
- 6M
- -24.20%
- 1Y
- 17.78%
- 3Y*
- 76.39%
- 5Y*
- 49.60%
- 10Y*
- 31.76%
SPMO vs. LUG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 24.29% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | -27.87% | 309.94% | 76.65% | 32.70% | 22.82% | -4.62% | 34.40% | 74.11% | 1.61% | -7.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and LUG.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. LUG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
LUG.TO
SPMO vs. LUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPMO | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.10 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 0.49 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | 1.31 | +10.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPMO | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 0.32 | +1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | 1.07 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 | 0.73 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.10 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. LUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum LUG.TO drawdown of -95.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and LUG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -95.13% | +64.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -36.21% | +23.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -36.21% | +16.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -43.37% | +20.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | -46.50% | +15.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -36.12% | +31.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -71.96% | +67.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 13.66% | -10.36% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. LUG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is 9.44%, while Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) has a volatility of 17.81%. This indicates that SPMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | LUG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.44% | 17.81% | -8.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.82% | 41.78% | -25.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.72% | 56.18% | -37.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 46.83% | -27.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 43.76% | -23.35% |
Dividends
SPMO vs. LUG.TO - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than LUG.TO's 5.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUG.TO Lundin Gold Inc. | 5.30% | 3.35% | 2.69% | 3.26% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.69% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and LUG.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and LUG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer