PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMO vs. LUG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMO vs. LUG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPMO is traded in USD, while LUG.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LUG.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 24.29% return, which is significantly higher than LUG.TO's -27.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has underperformed LUG.TO with an annualized return of 20.38%, while LUG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 31.76% annualized return.


SPMO

1D
2.50%
1M
2.83%
YTD
24.29%
6M
22.86%
1Y
39.53%
3Y*
40.28%
5Y*
23.06%
10Y*
20.38%

LUG.TO

1D
0.15%
1M
-15.65%
YTD
-27.87%
6M
-24.20%
1Y
17.78%
3Y*
76.39%
5Y*
49.60%
10Y*
31.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMO vs. LUG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
24.29%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%
LUG.TO
Lundin Gold Inc.
-27.87%309.94%76.65%32.70%22.82%-4.62%34.40%74.11%1.61%-7.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMO and LUG.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMO vs. LUG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

LUG.TO
LUG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMO vs. LUG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPMOLUG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.10

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

0.49

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.02

1.31

+10.71

SPMO vs. LUG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the LUG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPMO and LUG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPMOLUG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

0.32

+1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

1.07

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

0.73

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.10

+0.88

Drawdowns

SPMO vs. LUG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum LUG.TO drawdown of -95.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and LUG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMOLUG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.95%

-95.13%

+64.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-36.21%

+23.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-36.21%

+16.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

-43.37%

+20.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-46.50%

+15.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-36.12%

+31.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-71.96%

+67.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

13.66%

-10.36%

Volatility

SPMO vs. LUG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is 9.44%, while Lundin Gold Inc. (LUG.TO) has a volatility of 17.81%. This indicates that SPMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMOLUG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.44%

17.81%

-8.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.82%

41.78%

-25.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

56.18%

-37.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

46.83%

-27.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

43.76%

-23.35%

Dividends

SPMO vs. LUG.TO - Dividend Comparison

SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than LUG.TO's 5.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUG.TO
Lundin Gold Inc.
5.30%3.35%2.69%3.26%1.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.69%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMO and LUG.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMO and LUG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer