SPMO vs. GDX
SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPMO returned 20.38%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for GDX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPMO charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
SPMO vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPMO achieves a 24.29% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -8.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SPMO has outperformed GDX with an annualized return of 20.38%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.82% annualized return.
SPMO
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 24.29%
- 6M
- 22.86%
- 1Y
- 39.53%
- 3Y*
- 40.28%
- 5Y*
- 23.06%
- 10Y*
- 20.38%
GDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -8.28%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 53.51%
- 3Y*
- 37.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
SPMO vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 24.29% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -8.28% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPMO and GDX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.18 |
The correlation between SPMO and GDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SPMO vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPMO
GDX
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPMO
GDX
-
Industrials
SPMO
GDX
-
Communication Services
SPMO
GDX
-
Healthcare
SPMO
GDX
-
Financial Services
SPMO
GDX
-
Consumer Defensive
SPMO
GDX
-
Energy
SPMO
GDX
-
Utilities
SPMO
GDX
-
Basic Materials
SPMO
GDX
Consumer Cyclical
SPMO
GDX
-
Real Estate
SPMO
GDX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPMO vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
SPMO
GDX
SPMO vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPMO | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.22 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 1.68 | +1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | 4.32 | +7.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPMO | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 1.16 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.19 | 0.47 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 | 0.35 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.12 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
SPMO vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPMO drawdown since its inception was -30.95%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPMO and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPMO | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.95% | -80.34% | +49.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -32.09% | +19.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -32.09% | +11.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.74% | -46.51% | +23.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.95% | -49.79% | +18.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.65% | -32.09% | +27.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -40.43% | +35.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 12.42% | -9.12% |
Volatility
SPMO vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is 9.44%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 16.05%. This indicates that SPMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPMO | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.44% | 16.05% | -6.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.82% | 38.61% | -22.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.72% | 46.36% | -27.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 36.61% | -17.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 37.27% | -16.86% |
SPMO vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPMO vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than GDX's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.69% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPMO and GDX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (16.05%) compared to SPMO (9.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPMO dropped -30.95% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.38% vs 12.82% for GDX. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 9.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.38% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.69% for SPMO.
SPMO is categorized as Momentum, while GDX is Gold. SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for SPMO and 0.51% for GDX.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPMO and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer