SPICHA.SW vs. L100.L
SPICHA.SW (UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis) and L100.L (Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc) are both Europe Equities funds - SPICHA.SW tracks the SPI® Index while L100.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPICHA.SW returned 7.70%/yr vs 6.53%/yr for L100.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPICHA.SW charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for L100.L.
Performance
SPICHA.SW vs. L100.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SPICHA.SW is traded in CHF, while L100.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the L100.L values have been converted to CHF using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPICHA.SW achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly lower than L100.L's 5.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SPICHA.SW has outperformed L100.L with an annualized return of 7.70%, while L100.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.53% annualized return.
SPICHA.SW
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 3.22%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 10.32%
- 3Y*
- 7.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
L100.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 5.87%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- 1Y
- 15.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.53%
SPICHA.SW vs. L100.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPICHA.SW UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis | 3.22% | 17.65% | 6.05% | 5.82% | -16.70% | 23.29% | 3.83% | 29.94% | -8.35% | 19.42% |
L100.L Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc | 5.87% | 18.23% | 15.94% | 2.91% | -5.07% | 20.29% | -16.76% | 20.03% | -13.45% | 17.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPICHA.SW and L100.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2011 | 0.61 |
The correlation between SPICHA.SW and L100.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPICHA.SW vs. L100.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPICHA.SW
L100.L
SPICHA.SW vs. L100.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW) and Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPICHA.SW | L100.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.24 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 2.11 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | 7.35 | -3.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPICHA.SW | L100.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.30 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.52 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.37 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.08 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
SPICHA.SW vs. L100.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPICHA.SW drawdown since its inception was -26.92%, smaller than the maximum L100.L drawdown of -59.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPICHA.SW and L100.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPICHA.SW | L100.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.92% | -59.17% | +32.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -7.50% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.90% | -16.50% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.48% | -20.58% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.92% | -42.23% | +15.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -1.50% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.21% | -19.06% | +13.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 2.16% | +0.93% |
Volatility
SPICHA.SW vs. L100.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis (SPICHA.SW) is 3.18%, while Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc (L100.L) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that SPICHA.SW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than L100.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPICHA.SW | L100.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 3.36% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.93% | 10.03% | -1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.37% | 12.21% | -0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 15.39% | -2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 17.90% | -3.98% |
SPICHA.SW vs. L100.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPICHA.SW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than L100.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPICHA.SW vs. L100.L - Dividend Comparison
SPICHA.SW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, while L100.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L100.L Lyxor FTSE 100 UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPICHA.SW UBS ETF (CH) – SPI® (CHF) A-dis | 2.20% | 2.64% | 2.96% | 2.94% | 2.83% | 2.26% | 2.55% | 2.60% | 3.21% | 2.62% | 3.04% | 2.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPICHA.SW and L100.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPICHA.SW is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPICHA.SW is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for L100.L.
SPICHA.SW tracks SPI® Index, while L100.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SPICHA.SW and 0.14% for L100.L.
Find the right allocation for SPICHA.SW and L100.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer