SPHY vs. QAI
SPHY (SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF) and QAI (IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while QAI is a Long-Short fund tracking the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHY returned 5.03%/yr vs 3.79%/yr for QAI. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SPHY charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QAI.
Performance
SPHY vs. QAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHY achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than QAI's 7.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHY has outperformed QAI with an annualized return of 5.03%, while QAI has yielded a comparatively lower 3.79% annualized return.
SPHY
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 6.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.03%
QAI
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 7.58%
- 6M
- 8.00%
- 1Y
- 14.10%
- 3Y*
- 9.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- 3.79%
SPHY vs. QAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | 1.32% | 8.59% | 8.54% | 12.81% | -10.57% | 5.61% | 6.65% | 13.16% | -3.35% | 7.35% |
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 7.58% | 8.29% | 6.67% | 10.07% | -8.68% | -0.16% | 5.73% | 8.68% | -3.32% | 6.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHY and QAI is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2012 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, SPHY and QAI have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.44, meaning their price movements have been converging.
SPHY vs. QAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHY
QAI
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SPHY
QAI
Energy
SPHY
QAI
Basic Materials
SPHY
-
QAI
Communication Services
SPHY
-
QAI
Consumer Cyclical
SPHY
-
QAI
Consumer Defensive
SPHY
-
QAI
Healthcare
SPHY
-
QAI
Industrials
SPHY
-
QAI
Real Estate
SPHY
-
QAI
Technology
SPHY
-
QAI
Utilities
SPHY
-
QAI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHY vs. QAI — Risk / Return Rank
SPHY
QAI
SPHY vs. QAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPHY | QAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.45 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 3.81 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.14 | 15.45 | -2.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPHY | QAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 2.26 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.66 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.61 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.56 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
SPHY vs. QAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHY drawdown since its inception was -21.97%, which is greater than QAI's maximum drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHY and QAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHY | QAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.97% | -14.95% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.41% | -3.71% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.85% | -7.78% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.29% | -14.32% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.97% | -14.95% | -7.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -1.72% | +1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -2.57% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 0.91% | -0.38% |
Volatility
SPHY vs. QAI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF (SPHY) is 1.10%, while IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that SPHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHY | QAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 2.56% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.94% | 5.25% | -2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.69% | 6.26% | -2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.18% | 6.60% | +0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.88% | 6.19% | +1.69% |
SPHY vs. QAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHY has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than QAI's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPHY vs. QAI - Dividend Comparison
SPHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, more than QAI's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 1.40% | 1.50% | 2.22% | 4.08% | 2.00% | 0.28% | 1.98% | 1.91% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.48% |
SPHY SPDR Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | 7.28% | 7.38% | 7.80% | 7.30% | 6.47% | 5.13% | 5.63% | 5.73% | 4.09% | 4.41% | 4.27% | 4.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHY and QAI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QAI has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to SPHY (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHY dropped -21.97% vs QAI's -14.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPHY leads with 5.03% vs 3.79% for QAI. On fees, SPHY is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHY has performed better with a 5.03% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHY is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QAI.
SPHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.28%, compared with 1.40% for QAI.
SPHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while QAI is Long-Short. SPHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while QAI tracks IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPHY and 0.79% for QAI.
QAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHY and QAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer