SPHQ vs. VYM
SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ returned 14.91%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for VYM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPHQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
SPHQ vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 10.82% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 14.91%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.70% annualized return.
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 15.48%
- 1Y
- 21.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.07%
- 5Y*
- 14.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
VYM
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 24.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
SPHQ vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 14.28% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 10.82% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHQ and VYM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2006 | 0.83 |
The correlation between SPHQ and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPHQ vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHQ
VYM
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPHQ
VYM
Industrials
SPHQ
VYM
Consumer Defensive
SPHQ
VYM
Financial Services
SPHQ
VYM
Healthcare
SPHQ
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
SPHQ
VYM
Basic Materials
SPHQ
VYM
Communication Services
SPHQ
VYM
Utilities
SPHQ
VYM
Energy
SPHQ
VYM
Real Estate
SPHQ
-
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHQ vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
SPHQ
VYM
SPHQ vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPHQ | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.43 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 3.65 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.19 | 13.64 | -3.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPHQ | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.36 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.81 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.72 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.50 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
SPHQ vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, roughly equal to the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHQ | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -56.98% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -6.69% | -2.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -14.46% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -15.84% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | -35.21% | +3.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -1.89% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.70% | -7.19% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 1.79% | +0.30% |
Volatility
SPHQ vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.82%. This indicates that SPHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHQ | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 2.82% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 7.73% | +2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.83% | 10.35% | +2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 13.98% | +2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 16.35% | +1.53% |
SPHQ vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPHQ vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than VYM's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.05% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.22% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHQ and VYM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to VYM (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.91% vs 11.70% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.91% return vs 11.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 1.05% for SPHQ.
SPHQ is categorized as S&P 500, while VYM is Dividend. SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHQ and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer