PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHQ vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHQ vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 14.91%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.32% annualized return.


SPHQ

1D
0.58%
1M
3.64%
YTD
14.28%
6M
15.48%
1Y
21.15%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
14.25%
10Y*
14.91%

VONG

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
4.12%
6M
3.06%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
23.77%
5Y*
14.57%
10Y*
18.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHQ vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
14.28%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
4.12%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHQ and VONG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between SPHQ and VONG has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SPHQ vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHQ
VONG

Technology

28.1%
51.4%

Industrials

24.3%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

15.4%
2.7%

Financial Services

13.3%
5.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
13.2%

Basic Materials

2.2%
0.3%

Communication Services

2.0%
13.2%

Utilities

1.0%
0.3%

Energy

0.7%
0.4%

Real Estate

-

0.4%

Technology

SPHQ
28.1%
VONG
51.4%

Industrials

SPHQ
24.3%
VONG
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

SPHQ
15.4%
VONG
2.7%

Financial Services

SPHQ
13.3%
VONG
5.3%

Healthcare

SPHQ
8.4%
VONG
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHQ
4.6%
VONG
13.2%

Basic Materials

SPHQ
2.2%
VONG
0.3%

Communication Services

SPHQ
2.0%
VONG
13.2%

Utilities

SPHQ
1.0%
VONG
0.3%

Energy

SPHQ
0.7%
VONG
0.4%

Real Estate

SPHQ

-

VONG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHQ vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHQ vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHQVONGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

1.31

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

4.39

+5.80

SPHQ vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHQ and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHQVONGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.36

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.69

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.88

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.89

-0.36

Drawdowns

SPHQ vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHQVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.83%

-32.72%

-25.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-16.23%

+7.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-23.27%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-32.72%

+7.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

-32.72%

+1.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-4.47%

+2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-4.88%

-5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

4.85%

-2.76%

Volatility

SPHQ vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) is 3.90%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that SPHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHQVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

4.78%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

12.08%

-1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

15.71%

-2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.48%

21.38%

-4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.88%

20.90%

-3.02%

SPHQ vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPHQ vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than VONG's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.05%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.44%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHQ and VONG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VONG has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to SPHQ (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs VONG's -32.72%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.32% vs 14.91% for SPHQ. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.32% return vs 14.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.

SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.44% for VONG.

SPHQ is categorized as S&P 500, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.06% for VONG.

SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHQ and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer