PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPHQ vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPHQ vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 8.45% return.


SPHQ

1D
0.58%
1M
3.64%
YTD
14.28%
6M
15.48%
1Y
21.15%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
14.25%
10Y*
14.91%

BBUS

1D
0.23%
1M
0.44%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.40%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPHQ vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
14.28%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%18.02%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
8.45%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SPHQ and BBUS is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.93

The correlation between SPHQ and BBUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPHQ vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPHQ
BBUS

Technology

28.1%
39.7%

Industrials

24.3%
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

15.4%
4.0%

Financial Services

13.3%
10.5%

Healthcare

8.4%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
9.7%

Basic Materials

2.2%
0.9%

Communication Services

2.0%
11.3%

Utilities

1.0%
1.9%

Energy

0.7%
3.0%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Technology

SPHQ
28.1%
BBUS
39.7%

Industrials

SPHQ
24.3%
BBUS
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPHQ
15.4%
BBUS
4.0%

Financial Services

SPHQ
13.3%
BBUS
10.5%

Healthcare

SPHQ
8.4%
BBUS
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPHQ
4.6%
BBUS
9.7%

Basic Materials

SPHQ
2.2%
BBUS
0.9%

Communication Services

SPHQ
2.0%
BBUS
11.3%

Utilities

SPHQ
1.0%
BBUS
1.9%

Energy

SPHQ
0.7%
BBUS
3.0%

Real Estate

SPHQ

-

BBUS
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPHQ vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPHQ vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPHQBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.65

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

12.09

-1.90

SPHQ vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPHQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPHQ and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPHQBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.02

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.77

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.82

-0.29

Drawdowns

SPHQ vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPHQBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.83%

-35.35%

-22.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-9.21%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-19.01%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-25.46%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-2.68%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-5.45%

-5.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.02%

+0.07%

Volatility

SPHQ vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) have volatilities of 3.90% and 3.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPHQBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

3.78%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

9.37%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

12.15%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.48%

17.07%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.88%

19.60%

-1.72%

SPHQ vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPHQ vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than BBUS's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.05%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPHQ and BBUS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHQ has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to BBUS (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.25% vs 13.01% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.25% return vs 13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.

SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 1.00% for BBUS.

SPHQ is categorized as S&P 500, while BBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPHQ and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer